Nope I am meaning german 665 UHT like i wrote and reasons why it should stay in 12.0 since french is better version of it.
And besides mistrals are way better compared on stingers on german version
Yeah literally 100% of f3h-2 I’ve ran into will just turn no matter what lose all their speed and then die cause of that. Probably why it was moved down in the first place. As far as I understand it it turns ok at top speed, has good/great acceleration for 9.0 and can carry 4 missiles. And the first aim9 isnt useless, especially having 4 of them is helpful. Even if its not a monster shouldn’t have moved down in the first place.
The 2a7 should be a higher BR.
The M1A2 is comparable to the 2a5
Which shock horror is 12.0
1 Like
The T55AMD1 and AM1 are going to 9.0
The TTS had the same round as rhe 10.7 m1 abrams.
Has great optics.
Has thermal imaging.
Has a more survivable layout than the T55s as well.
The tanks armours are about equal bar the era or the horrible composites.
The T55A goijg to 8.7 is prettt ridiculous as is but its.not as bad as the others going to 9.0.
How are they equal to the likes of the ztz88A/B
The magachs.
Shot kals
Stv104.
The mobility once spaded isnt much different than a T55?
2 Likes
Too many folks on tbese topics dont wsnt actual balance though
4 Likes
Doesn’t deserve any higher than 10.3.
A beast at CQC, will get gulf war’d anywhere else.
In fact, 9.x tanks has faster target acquire speed and first shot advantage. Not saying this T-80 should be 9.X, but just giving context.
which is more a thing of how horrible the Abrams is pen wise at 10.7 than how good the TTS is pen wise at 9.0.
The t80UD is an 11.7 tank with mango rounds and a t72 enginr.
It stil has fantastic optics sin the thermals.
Good turret traverse, decent mobility as well.
Why you say its just for cqc is wild af, its a side grade to the 80B
1 Like
Tbh while i do believe the M1 should get a better round, the m774 is still good enough for the BR, got over 215 angle pen on a 5 second reload and a monster fast platform.
Just got the m1kvt to bolster my 10.7 lineup n im near.in a 2.0 kd with it
It appears that way because grinding to top tier in another tank tree takes extreme amount of time.
If you’re exposed to only one side of the vehicle (fighting/fighting in), it’s hard to make a proper argument.
What ? Ive got over half the trees in game at top tier or 11.7 man, ive over 3000 hours on the game over nearly 6 years.
I want the game objectively balanced. So people have to use their brains a little.
For example not roll around in a type90 farming 10.3s
Or stomping abiut in a t80UD in 9.3 matches.
Oh shock the m1a1 clickbait, hc and m1a2 are stupidely good as well yet somehow sit lower than the arietes at 12.0 or the leopard 2a5 and subsequently a6.
Or how china has the ztz99s at 11.0 and they absolutely wreck house?
People on these topics just cry that their specific fav tank or plane should move down.
2 Likes
if grinding to top tier in trees didn’t take that much time, you would see much more balanced feedback, is what I’m saying.
How would you know if T-80BVM is really that OP or over hyped, if you dont have it, and getting to the particular tank takes months if not years of extreme grinding? Let’s say, maybe 10k RP a day, few rounds…you can see how long it takes.
Now imagine this of someone without premium vehicles and account.
Then id suggest getting better.
I made what, 100k rp yesterday in about 7 games.
What does the grind havw to do with people demanding their tank specifically id OP?
Especially a premium tank… which by all intemts and purposes should be worse than a TT counterpart.
It doesnt take that much time though.
Ive got i think 5 or 6 nations for ground top tier and 5 for air.
Its.not some big deal realistically, struggling with the grinds no excuse for stuff to be unbalanced.
Btw if it was balanced then the grind would be easier
1 Like
the average player gets 0.8 kills per spawn according to statshark. No data on how many times they spawn, but I guess it is within 1000-4000 RP range
Premium tanks still fight other vehicles (tech tree/prem) that are not owned by the suggesting player, so people can still make suggestions without being on both side of shooting/being shot at.
m60AMBT
10.0 to 10.3 GRB
It outperforms the Sabra in every aspect: autocannon, mobility, and auxiliary equipment. Gaijin, you can’t just ignore the AMBT because it makes players spend more Silver Lions on crates and allows you to rake in massive transaction fees from the exchange.
4 Likes
And think the strv 103 c is going at 9.0 for no reason
1 Like
This adjustment has completely destroyed the last remaining purpose of the Israeli tech tree. The only two BR that offered a playable experience – 9.7 and 11.3 – were completely ruined by the changes to the Sabra, Merkava 2D, and Kurnass 2000. Now, the only meaning of researching the Israeli tech tree is to announce to other players that you have severe intellectual disabilities.
Yea it is and its a big diffrance and i played both t55 was op
Mode: Realistic Battles
Vehicle: F-4F Early
BR: 10.7 → 10.0
Reason: It has no countermeasures at a BR where it regularly faces all aspect IR missiles, including long range IRs like the R-24T, as well as IRCCM missiles like the R-73 and AIM-9M and competent SARH missiles like the R-24R and AIM-7E-2.
All the while it is nothing more than a slight upgrade over the F-4C with wing slats and slightly better IRs, meanwhile losing its Sparrows.
This should not constitute a .7 increase over the F-4C.
5 Likes
If you play full matches and not ODL youll earn substantially more RP.
What does this even mean?
Im referencing the fact that now adays we get premiums that are miles better than their TT counterparts.
Clearest example recently?
CLOVIS VS DF105
2 Likes