Planned Battle Rating changes for April 2025

Strangely. I do quite well in the GR4. Better than the GR1 despite the higher BR. Actually managed to out gunfight an F-16 the other day, was rather funny :D

1 Like

HOT-3 & TRIGAT-LR inferior to AGM-114K Hellfire II

You mean EC-665 Tiger HAC ?

But change BR for ground AB only : 11.0 → 11.7

That is, I feel good on my Mirage against the Su-27, Su-33, F-15 in - 90% of all my battles? And others in which the number and quality of missiles is many times better and in all flight and technical characteristics are better (and I have only two playable missiles) MLD - although it does not have the best radar, the missiles have an inertial guidance system and protection from protective dipoles in the frontal part of the projection of the enemy aircraft against the background of the ground, even with a lock failure the missile hits. If you compare missiles, then compare their number and the enemies you encounter. Magic 2 does not give a 100% guarantee of shooting down an aircraft, and its protection against obstacles does not all work. Are the R60M capable of shooting down an enemy head-on if launched from 1 km? MLD is more comfortable because it does not see 13.0 - it has better maneuverability and tears the wing from its speed and dynamics (if not controlled). If you mention radar, please mention the characteristics of radar missiles and their capabilities. I remember it from the moment it was introduced into the game and I know that MLD can now after it has been nerfed more than once. Explain why two magic 2s are equivalent to the Phantom S armament (4 infrared rear + 4 radar)? Why are two Magic 2s better than MLD (4 infrared + 2 radar R24R/infrared 24T)?

I based it around Type 90 BR which has much better stats than m1a1


STOP LETTING USA GET SUBSIDIES BY PLAYING AWFUL.
while others pay taxes for playing good ffs.

In the same illogical theory, F-86A-5 should be 7.7.

12 Likes

More top tier CAS vehicles is going to 13.0 (i think F-15E is excluded for some odd reason). New players with clickbait shouldn’t face top tier CAS

Besides, equalizing abrams with 2a7v is insane.

I haven’t played it much, but the reason you see is MiG-15 being spammed and not F-86A says it all.

You haven’t seen one≠it doesnt exist, or to say at least, you were simply judging from your experience.
And my dude apparently never heard of Mirage 2000D smh :S
BTW, not gonna talk this further cuz just spamming skill issue like a wonder weapon meanwhile you cant get a KD1 versus air is self defeating, period.

It doesn’t mean F-86A-5 isn’t broken, but only MiG-15 is.

The only thing it does well is that it’s fast on a straight line. In the era of missiles and Su-11, the BNZ run-away meta slowly dies in uptiers.

Even dodging a 9B require a 60-90 deg turn, which is bleeding of energy.

I know you love to make the wildest claims, but claiming F-86A-5 is fine in 8.0 because of ‘BnZ meta is dying in uptier due to the introduction of missiles’ is
In the same level of [J-7D needs to be 10.3 bc it can’t bomb]

Every plane in that BR needs to turn to evade AIM-9B or fight against supersonic jets like F-104
Reasoning that as ‘why F-86A need to be low’ is a mindless idea.

Both of F-86A-5 and MiG-15 variants are undertiered.

2 Likes

Strv103C going 9.0? Rlly hoping Gaijin Dev not taking any kinds of MDMA😰

These BR changes to the Namer will kill it. It is already just an okay vehicle. One hit on the turret and all the ammunition it has explodes. It has no extra missiles inside the hull, like the Freccia or ammunition for the cannon. Either let it stay at 10.7 or give it more missiles.

The decision to raise the Type 81 (C) is also a really foolish one. The Japanese only get this one AA for all of top tier and it has no search radar! It relies solely on the skill of the user to find air targets! Yes, the missiles are very strong, but that’s all this truck has!

Also the 2S38 still being untouched while it is just a tad bit worse than the HSTV-L and better(!) than the RDF-LT is also laughably bad of a decision (AGAIN).

Credit where credit is due, raising the bar for top tier planes in ground realistic battles is a good idea.

3 Likes

I’m sorry, but I have to disagree. Even as a French main, I have to admit, The AMX M4 is incredibly cracked at 6.7. Its mobility is one of the best despite being a medium tank (literally has 1k HP), its pen is ridiculously good after the buffs it got, its post-pen can easily one-shot vehicles despite being a solid shot, its armor is very adequate and its agility is incredible (turning, turret traverse, reverse speed). And while the reload rate is not as fast as later tanks, it’s still straight up faster than anyone else even on ace (which, let’s be honest, you won’t encounter much either), no idea how you can complain about that. In its current state, it outright felt criminal to use and I completely have to agree with it getting up to 7.0 (atleast now I can also pair it with the AuF1). There are other vehicles that deserve more complaining like the AMX-13, E.B.R. 1951 and Char 25T for examples, but atleast don’t complain about vehicles that straight up deserve it.

Mode: Naval realistic
Vehicle: HMS Renown
BR Change: lower BR needed, 7.0 → 6.7
Reason: Actually sister ship HMS Repulse is almost the same as Renown, and she is 6.7

2 Likes

The tts is also a br higher and with all its upgrade it pays with hella bad mobilitt and 0 armor against anything that is not heat

1 Like

AB

M48GA2 G A2
8.3 to 8.0
It doesn’t have a stabilizer, it has little use and a low win ratio. The only good thing about it is the DM23.

1 Like

Char 25T 8.0-7.3 GRB
At least it compares with object906, it is worse, no STAB, no HEAT, and worse penetration, and also compared to those 100mm/120mm guns at 7.7, it is also worse due to the penetration, armor, and mobility

8 Likes

Since Vextra was kept at 9.7 but given a worse shell to accompany the AMX-40 in a line-up, give it a better shell and move it up to 10.0 to keep it company there.

7 Likes

I mean its the same reason why the MiG-21SMT/MF is at 10.3 now. Even though they should be 10.7 bc they where perfectly fine at 10.7. Players dont know how to use such a strong kit and fail the result is that it will get a lower br. with the SMT and MF i have like 200 deaths - 900 Kills. Its insane how that plane at 10.3 is. same for J35XS should also be 10.7 again.

And like you said the J-7D was good at 11.0 i understand that they have it at 10.7 with that shit engine that overheats so fast but 11.0 would be fine for it.

i mean the J-7E is carried by the PL-5Bs at 11.3 otherwise it would be 10.7 or 11.0 so the J-7D is fine where it is.

Also i bought a Talisman for the J-7E bc it is so good.

3 Likes