Planned Battle Rating changes for April 2025

I mean this is the most random br changes weve seen for ages.

Tkx p to 11.7 but not the type 90s.

T55s all shifting up now theyre planned to be the same br as tanks such as the shot kal dalet, megachs and ofc th3 m60a3 tts.

Not including th3 likes or zm803 and such.

We need 12.7 min for ground rb now

3 Likes

Dollar players often shows his death montage and on stream he seems just like a normal player despite me seeing him do well in some matches. Crazy how some people just assume most content creators get essentially bot player lobbies lol

2 Likes

Ofc arb

1 Like

Dumbest post ever in this topic

5 Likes

12.0 M2K is really bad idea when you compare to other 12.0s and makes OP even more if they gets 12.0 blankets.

An aircraft with a very decent flight model and a Magic II that works as x2 “I win buttons” should not have the same BR as Tornado F.3/ADVs or Navy Phantoms.

Rather it should be moved up to 12.7 even if they are missing MAWS.

1 Like

Thats even worse then no?

Ive got the mig23M rn and im 12k from the mld.but took a break from air rn.

The mld radar is cheeks, only working bellow 1500 meters at a specific angle to the ground for the mti mode.

It lacks a functional PD mode.
It has only 2 good radar missiles with four shambolic R60s

Why add R73s just to artificially fire its BR up?

I reckon without r73s it could possibly go to 12.0 right now but again it lacks a pd radar.

(If they make MTI like it used to be then with no other changes it should br 12.0)

Genuinely asking as ive never had a problem with the flogger no matter the model.

2 Likes

I dont either, its bc i would drawn comparison to the BISON, which trades FM for HMD and R-27Rs which are much better(+RWR)

1 Like

Vehicle: Mirage F1C/F1CT
BR: no changes
Other changes: additonal 2x R.530 stock, R.530 modification removed
Most 11.7 or 12.0 fighter aircrafts should receive SARH on stock, or better IR AAM if possible.

6 Likes

Vehicle: MiG-23MLA/MLD
BR: no changes
Other changes: additional 2xR-23R/T stock, R-23R and R-23T modifications removed
The MiG-23s are good but would benefit from a more smoother stock grind.

3 Likes

The bison has a better radar, hmd,.pd and also r27s as well as two r73s

And a good mig21 platform having better aviomic and such.

The mig23 MLD gets stomped by the bison
(Btw 12.3 also means you believe the mig23 MLD.on par with the f18A ajd f16s

1 Like

Vehicle: Tornado IDS family(IDS ASSTA1/MFG/A-200/A-200 1995/GR.1/GR.4)
BR: no changes, but preferably all to 11.3 bar GR.4(edit: ARB)
Other changes: one extra 1,000lb bomb on hardpoint 6(centerline)
As dedicated bomber CAS, the tornados were not able to destroy entire bases with their lackluster stock loadout.
Paveways and JDAMs are less relevant in ARB due to the presense of multiple fighters, and they are mostly still relegated to base bombing and therefore demonstrate no difference to A-200/MFG.

6 Likes

Vehicle: Leclerc S1, S2, SXXI

Mode: GRB

Change: BR 12.0 → 11.7

Reason: Mediocre protection compared to other tanks at the same battle rating. Horrible dart, in fact one of the worst at this BR, the spall/post-pen are horrible which often puts you in really hard situations. OFL 120 F1 is not good enough to keep up with top tier standards. The reason why Leclerc has really good stats is because of the skilled players who control it. Other than that there’s no real reason why this vehicle should be at the same battle rating as e.g. T-90M. Oh but it has 5 second autoloader you might say - yes it does help but what is the difference when you often can’t get through enemy’s weak spot and get a kill in one shot like other tanks can do.

I did not include the AZUR in this list because of a recent buff it received. The addition of LWS makes it unique from other variants as well as having access to AZUR era which might not be as useful as LWS but it’s still a cool feature increasing overall protection, even by small amount.

9 Likes

ARB F104S TAF 11.3->11.0/10.7 the plane is worse than the MiG-21 bis in terms of its overall characteristics. The weakest premium plane. On ThunderSkill 0.72 kills to deaths. Players have long been asking for a reduction in br.
1

7 Likes

stop joking and go outside already

3 Likes

Lol. Lmao even.

And you know the 1E better than tanks that you’ve played way more, so that’s why you do twice as good with it? Seems legit. Definitely the reason why. Ion_Protogen has the same kind of stats in it where his K/D goes from a 2.0 roughly to a 4.0 and he openly mentioned that. This argument is like me trying to say that my roughly 2.0 K/D in the Somua is only because I know the strengths and weaknesses of the tank and that it’s totally not undertiered lol.

And for that screenshot I assumed you were pointing out literally anything else since barrel sniping is something you can do on any tank, making a breach weakness that does nothing to the crew irrelevant.

1 Like

90% of these popular YouTubers have been around since before name hiding was even a thing. It’s not difficult to check their stat card

1 Like

Shvaks are actually good now, and are overperforming by quite a bit.

2 mins is enough when your engine at low throttle is more efficient than anything humans have created. You also don’t need to full throttle to get the most out of the BI, unlike the Me-163s.

You don’t need any if you can’t get hit in the first place.

Reasonable, but it isn’t a massive detriment.

Mostly a skill issue. Defending the BI’s BR really isn’t helping you beat the allegations that you’re biases btw.

Anyways, the BI is a 7.3/7.7 plane at 6.7 for no apparent reason. If it weren’t a rare event plane, it would be genuinely pay to win, and that can’t be said about anything else apart from maybe the Kv-1E/B.

5 Likes

I have used both the Pz.BfW.VI P and the Tiger H1, and I feel that neither the body cutouts nor the cupola are often targeted. I thought the advantage of the 200mm armor on the front of the body and the increased retreat speed were more significant than that.

I thought that was the case, one of the strongest Canons at the moment and has been since Real-Shatter fix right?

I dont play much props these days

My guy have you tried to use the radar on the MLD? It only switches to MTI if it’s almost exclusively looking at the ground. It is so genuinely frustrating to use that I have a better time just sneaking the IR version at people. The R-60M is also one of the most flare hungry missiles in the game, it’s not uncommon to have to go after the flares from other jets somewhat near the target jet, so that mobility comes at a price on top of its very short range. It’s fine where it is.
Meanwhile the F1C is also fine where it is. You get a good armament, mid FM, and a boatload of countermeasures. Between the two I’d rather fly the F1C just because Magic 2 goes brrr and I never run out of flares

1 Like