plz support the cause by likeing the original post
3 Likes
It’s an interesting point you’ve made because to some extent you are right, in downtiers 8.7 tanks are very dangerous and anoying opponets but we must not forget that the majority of the games we play are usually uptiers or miduptiers. I am sure that 8.7 tanks will underperform in the 10.0 environment.
1 Like
it would be logical if absolutely all equipment above 8.3 would go 0.3-0.7 higher at once and not some separate cluster then yes there would be division but this way a disabled class of equipment is created from the best BR
what is the difference then between suffering 7.7 and the future 9.0
Destroy what is good on average in favor of what is not always bad?
bro… why the hell is marne going to 3.3… it has garbage guns and a sad crew count, its even worse the the litchfield which is at the same BR as it and doesnt cost as much as a cruiser, and thats considered the worst destroyer in game.
Ok, use it dumbly then and cry “Russia suffers”.
I think it’s pretty clear the wheeled vehicle he is talking about is the vextra. It’s OFL 105 F1 first appears at 8.7.
It can’t without the alphas also going up. they have better flight performance and loadouts at 8.7. They’re all also in the bracket where RADAR AA is introduced which already severly degrades CAS performance.
1 Like
The CAS is very comparable to the Saab, so it should get a higher BR like the other CCP fighters
I’m assuming you mean CCIP, CCRP is useless in ground. So you think they should balance solely on the ballistic computer, without regarding flight performance or loadout? that’s a pretty stupid take.
on tank rb yes and you know it to wepon are everything
That’s hilariously stupid. At least everyone can disregard your opinions now because they have no substance.
These should both stay at their current BR. Both are more than good enough and would stomp hard if moved down.
3 Likes
i think the m1a1 with m829a2 vs leopard2a4 is balance in your opinion. And everything can kill easili the object 279 in 9.0+
A tank faces stronger vehicles in an uptier, shocker.
I guess we are also going to move the M1, T-80B, UD/DU1, Challengers down to 10.3 along with the Leopard 2s for the same reason?
Or is this another case of “not my tanks, not my problem”?
Same goes the other way around. Every decent player I know or see online has at least a 2-5 K/D in it at 9.0, which is not all due to skill lmao.
1 Like
Yes, because in the current BR system, they do not belong to 11.7
Not true. Also the 279 already stomps 9.0, can 1 shot lolpen almost everything it faces and probably most importantly it’s BR range is 8.0-10.0, not 9.0+.
Mode: Air RB
Vehicle: J-7D
BR Change: 10.7 → 10.3
Reasoning:
Horrible airframe and always face against uptier opponents with CW seekers (F-4E(J) and Mig-23) that leaves it in extreme disadvantage high up, and has no all aspect missiles.
cannot have base bombing as an alternative grinding route due to gaijin refusal to give it napalm bombs
1 Like
It can constantly get to bases first and you don’t need IRCCM missiles if you play it right (not as a fighter)
Rip to:
2.3 (became 2.7 and the B1bis doesn’t have a lineup)
3.7 (Amx-13 went up, leaving the arl and other 3.7s without a backup light. the amx is also overtiered, and should be 3.7)
4.3 (ebr and amx-13 dca unfairly went up)
6.7 (amx-m4/amx-13 are going to 7.0)
7.3 (amx-50, Amx-13-90, and the aml-90 all went to 7.7)
8.3 (amx-30 dca went up because balancing AA on how good it is as an aa is beyond the snails capabilities)
6 Likes
Just because it’s a premium it doesn’t mean all premium vehicles should share the same BR. TURMS is nowhere close to 2A4.
1 Like