And also 30 seconds of repair on the top crew with any hit without the ability to turn around and respond
TKX (P) has a better hull though, with its lower UFP being around 570-600mm.
The Type 90’s is ~430 (which is still good enough to stop Leopard 2A4 / M1 Abrams / TTD in a full downtier).
Type 90 has a HP/TON ratio of 30, whereas the TKX (P) is 27.
TKX (P) is still pretty fast, with similar HP/TON as the M1A1 and T-80s.
F3H2 9.3 → 10.0 AirRB This plane is so broken for this BR.
I would say teh F4E is worse, its got a worse FM, worse retention, and the no PD radar so the missiles are all easily beaten.
IDS has two 9Ls going for over the Mirage F1 200 man, the F1 can go faster I believe top end.
yet they move hte TKX (P) arbitrarily when even on their won wikipedia call it a side grade to the Type 90s
I got them before more modules were intoduced and they were paper, so it wasnt as bad, now adays though?
i survive some amount of stuff in them, usually the fuel or auto loader soaks the round, so even though the breach isnt down i can fire back then run.
You miss the whole thing we said ?
The TKX (P) has a smaller ready rack, worse overall mobility bar backwards, and actually loses protection on the over all tank, maintains it on two sections on the front one on the hull and the other on the turret.
It has no right to go to 11.7 and the type 90 not.
the only reason the type 90 isnt is because of the Fuji.
+another reason, compare it to 6.7 J21RA at the current meta, they both have poor energy performance, but J21 is lighter, pulls more and have a far better firepower, plus an airbrake for steep dives
Vehicle: MiG27M/K
Mode: All
Change: Classify as Striker as the MiG23BN, another strike version of MiG23, is with striker mark.
Unironically skill issue, I’ve got 4 kills, a base and top of the team in a 13.7 up tier with a friend
It has them
Not even remotely true, you’re probably playing them wrong. Maybe there’s an argument for the standard B2, but the BRENUS is just so much better.
Nah bro, they tend to play Japan most of the times
it already fights thermals & stabilizers. worse thermals, but still.
just shoot first and no problemo, just dont get hit.
when holding a solid position 2.5s is enough to deal with several people coming in a row. and the round is just about good enough to effectively frontally kill any vehicles up to 11.0 from weakspots.
i would love to have a vehicle like that. there is the 2s reload vcc 80/60, but the 60mm damage is quite poor compared to nato 105mm.
in arcade battles, or? its 9.0 in air realistic.
I think we’ve already missed had like 2 bracket additions by now based on past patterns, no announced bracket changes yet again afaik, and to top it off no sim br adjustments whatsoever for the second time in a row. Truly the neglect sim players suffer is staggering
technically its inbetween both
Its the direct steb between chief and challenger so is a kinda like a mutt of both
sure dude, guess you have reading issue smh
Proposed BR Adjustments for Ground RB.
EC-665 Tiger UHT (11.7): Lower to 11.7 maybe even (11.3). Pars 3LR missiles are highly ineffective, often yielding only 2 kills from 8 missiles. Lacks cannon and radar, making it vulnerable.
F4F KWS LV (11.7): Keep at 11.7. Equipped with only 2 Mavericks and no other guided munitions, unlike peers with 4-6. Moving to 12.0 requires adding 4-6 Mavericks.
Eurofighters (12.7): Stay at 12.7. Excellent airframe but no fire-and-forget munitions. Brimstones, the least lethal option, require constant laser lock while dodging missiles, demanding far more effort for 6 kills compared to peers.
Suggestion: Ground RB BR ratings should prioritize air-to-ground capabilities over air-to-air loadouts for fairer balance, after all it is GROUND RB. Thanks for your consideration.
F-14A (+ IRIAF) & F14B both be given better IRCCM missiles or lowered one step as they are not that good jets.
AMX-13 (all of them) be lowered as they are not good at such high BRs.
Because you have a warped reality, and only see one side.

You are incredibly selective lmao. Anytime one of your points get countered you just plug your ears and go “lalalala I can’t hear you!” and pretend that I never said it.
Also if “being more skilled” is what validates someone’s opinion then I can think of at least 4 different YouTubers who blow you out of the water in skill that share my opinion and my word is officially the bible whenever you think you have an opinion on anything involving aircraft in the future.
Also your statcard proves my point too considering that your K/D with the 1E is 2x better than your other tanks on average :) But plug your ears again and pretend you didn’t hear that.
Considering a YouTuber is not an average player, and often is quite suspicious in the players they fight.
They also seem to have preferential match making.
My stat card is better with the KV-1E, lol yes, that ace crew, knowing all the strengths, and all the weakenesses, etc. hmm could also be odds of what I see vs you.