i agree with you here, but gaijin would probably prefer to wait a while because of the somewhat recent turret ring nerfs to LEOs & abrams.
imagine the amount that the usa mains would be crying if they raise it now.
its funny how the m1a1 is a direct upgrade to the ipm1, but both sit at the same br. raising the ma1a to 11.7 would finally give a reason to use the ipm1 again.
true
also hiii
yes, but actually shooting beyond 3km results in the shells self-destructing
why not 15.0 right away, it’s so easy to operate (no)
Top tier jets moving to 13.0 for GRB is great win.
But we also need to move peak BR for tanks as well. Top tier tanks should be 12.3.
11.3-11.7 br is always pulled into 12.0 matches. Brs from 11.0 suffer when uptiered which is most of the time.
Certain helicopters need to be bracketed. Too many of them too much BR and SL requirements.
Vehicle: Z-9WA
BR: no changes
Other changes: foldered under Z-9W
Essentially the same helicopter, with tigers being foldered I can see the same done to the Z-9s.
worst br suggestions i’ve ever seen in my life
Vehicle: HKP 9A FC
BR: no changes
Other changes: foldered under HKP 9A
Some helicopters should be foldered. The HKP 9A FC represents a minor upgrade.
Vehicle: Mi-24P(USSR)
BR: no changes
Other changes: foldered under Mi-24V
While the hinds are different in cannons, they are pretty much the same in gameplay. They should be foldered as well.
To not oversaturate the posts, here are a list of helicopters that I would suggest to be foldered, as a supplementary changes, without neccessarily changing their BRs:
AH-1W(AH-1Z)
AH-64A(AH-64D)
BO 105 PAH-1(BO-105 PAH-1A1)
Mi-24V(Mi-24P)
Mi-28N(Mi-28NM)
AH-1E(Japan)(AH-1S(Japan))
Z-9W(Z-9WA)
SA 314F(SA 342M)
HKP 9A(HKP 9A FC)
Tzefa B(Tzefa D/E)
Peten(Seraph)
You are incredibly selective lmao. Anytime one of your points get countered you just plug your ears and go “lalalala I can’t hear you!” and pretend that I never said it.
Also if “being more skilled” is what validates someone’s opinion then I can think of at least 4 different YouTubers who blow you out of the water in skill that share my opinion and my word is officially the bible whenever you think you have an opinion on anything involving aircraft in the future.
Also your statcard proves my point too considering that your K/D with the 1E is 2x better than your other tanks on average :) But plug your ears again and pretend you didn’t hear that.
Also cute that you seriously underangled the tank for that picture. It’s genuinely incredible how disingenuous your arguments are.
true for he rounds, but ap still does the trick.
The thing about Type 90 is that it somehow feels like it has spall liners all over the frontal arc; specially the hull section that is occupied by a black hole fuel tank.
While on other tanks fuel tanks are “fuel tanks exploded” insta-kill buttons, in Type 90 it feels like a spall liner on steroids every time. They never explode, and they always eat all the spall.
I admit that it is an extremely annoying tank to face because of that +4 second autoloader, even in top BR, but even more so as uptiered 10.3-11.3.
2.5s is very strong for 105, it would work perfectly fine even at 10.0, a very fast firing glass cannon with weak rounds.
it would not be fair at 9.3
Imo F-14B should remain at 13.0 but receive AIM-9M like F-15A.
Veak isn’t suitable for SPAA past 7.7 it lacks sustained fire and velocity. Ill take my ZSU-37-2 anyday of the week over the Veak.
Against thermal imagers and stabilizers?
And also 30 seconds of repair on the top crew with any hit without the ability to turn around and respond
TKX (P) has a better hull though, with its lower UFP being around 570-600mm.
The Type 90’s is ~430 (which is still good enough to stop Leopard 2A4 / M1 Abrams / TTD in a full downtier).
Type 90 has a HP/TON ratio of 30, whereas the TKX (P) is 27.
TKX (P) is still pretty fast, with similar HP/TON as the M1A1 and T-80s.