that certain demographic only flock to good vehicles like of of-40 mtca, itpsv, etc.
its funny how ‘they’ flocking to the amx-40 is one of the clearest signs to tell you that it is a very good vehicle.
2 Likes
I agree itpsv should go up too, I already mentioned that
TKX (P) has way better optics that Type90, both in zooming and thermal, better protection and reverse speed, it’s basic a Type10 with jm33. People playing Japan 11.3 lineup all know it outperforms Type90 and always put it as first option. So raise it to 11.7 is fine but not necessary to me.
Vehicle: CL-13 Mk.4 (Italy)
Mode: Air Realistic
BR Change: 8.3 > 8.0
Its an F-86A without leading edge slats, so worst than a Sabre F-86A. Gaijin let this plane at 8.3 after a Sabres moved down…
2 Likes
Ozelot should go back to 9.3 already
2 Likes
the TKX (p) protection is not better at all, having used them both for a few hundred games between them, the type 90 is more survivable and has more effective armour.
The TKX (P) has better armour on one very specific point of the turret.
The thermals arent that big a deal gen 1 and gen 2 while nice its still better to use thermals to spot then standard no thermals for firing.
The magnification is nice to have though.
The TKX (P) is less mobile forward though than the type, is also taller last i checked.
I prefer the type 90s over the TKX (P) its nice to have but its always my 3rd spawn over the two type 90s first.
The type 90 should go to 11.7 with the TKX (P).
theyre functionally identical gameplay wise.
EDIT: straight from the wiki
The TKX (P) comes as a supplement to the Type 90 with the improved Gen 3 thermals as opposed to Gen 1 and a smaller mantlet at the cost of turret side protection and overall mobility
5 Likes
im sorry but 8.3 planes should not be seeing the ozelot.
some decompression would solve its problems
2 Likes
The ozelot is one of the worst SPAA lmao it was fine at 9.3, you can just pull a bit of G and dive down and the missile is defeated, and even if, there is still the ZSU with Iglas which are far more annoying at 9.3
people really playing japan 11.3 understand that with the tkx(p) you get much better thermals & reverse speed for a downgrade in armor, acceleration & ready rack size. its a sidegrade vehicle and wholly depends on personal preference.
for me the extra 4 rounds in the rack with the 90 is the most important perk.
i dont agree that they are going to raise the tkx(p), but not the type 90s. all of them are about equally powerful and can go up no problem.
1 Like
the ozelot isnt the worst spaa at all.
the iglas stingers are over nerfed Im aware but the zsu is still a far worse platform to be using.
the ozelot is fine at 9.7 like i siad, no 8.3 should be against that in all fairness.
1 Like
So ozelot is a problem but not the PGZ04, SANTAL or literally the Toyota with Stingers?.. Make it make sense, thanks
Exactly my point!
the TKX P loses more than it gains so its fair being the same BR, now they are saying the TKX (P) is as good as an M1A2 abrams…
BTW the Type 90 not moving up is a bit shoddy
2 Likes
ozelot has the best AA radar in the game together with the stormer hvm.
this is true for all spaa ir missiles, except strela, antelope & type 81. all of them are really easy to dodge from the front.
1 Like
Ozelot may have a good IRST but its still not good for 9.7 when the Gepard 1A2 exists with extra 35mm, im tryna get some logic here why SANTAL, Type 93 and PGZ04 are all fine at 9.3 but no the IRST is such a problem that ozelot needs to be a higher BR. Ive had more problems dodging the Type 93s and PGZ04s missile than when a stinger is fired at me
Did I say they should stay 9.3? no I didnt.
for a start
sental has under half the turret rotation speed.
has worse verticle guidance
no laser range finder
is larger
is wheeled so worse on more terrain and the mistral missile is about all thats better.
think its optics are worse too
Because it has far better tracking systems than all of htem? what is difficult to understand?
1 Like
If laser rangefinder is a reason for you on a damn manpad, then i see no point in talking to you anymore already
Its a statistical advantage that the ozelot has over the sental, thats all im listing mate.
Don’t get such an attitude over it
5 aircraft rank VII change BR (Air RB)
-
F-104G (AM & Luftwaffe) : 11.0 → 10.7
Lose AIM-9E and AIM-9J
-
J-7D : 10.7 → 11.7
PL-2 replace with PL-8, but lose PL-5B
-
Mirage F1C : 12.0 → 11.7
Removed R.550 magic 2
-
MiG-21Bis (FiAF) : 11.0 → 10.7
Change WVR missile R-60MK to R-60
-
MiG-21Bis-SAU & MiG-21Bis lazur-M (GDR) : 11.0 → 10.7
R-60MK replace with R-60
PGZ04 & zsu-23-m4 should go up to 9.7 as they have radars + good missiles + good guns.
sidam (mistral) is already at 9.7 with worse missiles, guns and no seach radar, but with a fast turret.
and gepard 1a2 should go to 10.0 its a direct upgrade to the stormer AD at 10.0.
beetween SANTAL, Type 93 & ozelot, ozelots missiles are easily superior of the three and it has the excellent irst radar on top. santal has the poorest missiles of the 3 and standard search radar.
ozelot is justifiably a br step above those 2.
1 Like