Here’s the thing though, that 6.0 sec reload is the irl reload. The shir 2 which I love, should stay 9.7, I don’t see it as a problem there.
The mobility is pretty even for the shir / T64B
But I feel the AMX is going up because certain demographics that are known to cheat, like to use it in mass because it’s a good vehicle. I have no experience in it personally, but I’ve seen it do some consistently good work.
T64B I agree as well.
The T72AV also has absolutely amazing optics and is arguably a better sniper than the 2a4 and M1 abrams.
armours a hit or miss though
what
Yes decompression would be good, but I also believe the T-72B (10.3) should go back down to 10.0
Have you ever seen when good ground vehicle events come out? And suddenly there’s a lot of AMX-40s used by certain demographics?? That cheat?
Genuinely the T64B has more merit moving to 10.0 before the shir 2 on the fact that it has that 3bm42.
the Shir two and it should stay 9.7, or both move to 10.0, and shir get the L23A1 round.
*no 10.0 should have to face off against 11.0 with a damn 192 angle pen round.
Yeah I think the top speed goes to the T64 but the getting to its top speed goes to the Shir, However the reverse is disgracefully bad on T64B
The AMX40 I have it, its a nice tank, like a worse 2k
Has a slightly worse dart, the 20mm does worse overall, the speeds comparable but the overall mobility / turret and gun traverse goes to the 2k.
it does get gen 1thermals, but has no zoom function just fixed magnification
Oh don’t get me wrong, I do think the shir 2 and the T64B should be 9.7
The AMX-40 can be 10.0
But the Leo 2k definitely needs to go up.
Then you have the leopard 2k going up against the likes of hte Type90 and so on.
Proper decompression is needed for ground now, again, increase the BR to 12.7 or 13.0 and we could actually space these tanks out. rather than it being such a cluster fk of when its a downtier the tanks untouchable but in an uptier its useless.
This I also agree with. But tbf the Leo 2k’s armor eats a lot of well placed shots sometimes. In addition to its mobility and armament, it’s kinda OP
That doesnt change the fact its not upto fighting tanks that have post 300 pen darts at a 60 degree angle .
I keep it in my 12.0 lineup due to the nice mobility but you have to use it like a light tank not an MBT at that point
Move all type 90 to 11.7, absolutely no reason they should be 11.3.
The round is plenty sufficient to kill anything it faces.
The suspension also adjusts.
Not the greatest armor but neither do other 11.7 tanks like the Centauro 120z
And the 4 second autoloader that isn’t affected by losing a crew member is the main reason.
its random af the TKX (P) is going to 11.7 but ^Not the Type 90
Mode: Naval Arcade + Realistic
Ship: Cruisers
Change: 5.7->6.0
Reasoning: Stop compressing BR’s. Destroyers and low BR cruisers are helpless against top cruisers. We need more decompression, not other way around.
It does have an exellent commander optics just 4x-20x
see swings and roundabouts
Mode: Realistic Battles
Vehicle: Merkava mk.2D
BR change: 10.0 > 9.7
or BR change ,10.0 but rank Rank 6 > Rank 7
Reasoning: if 10.0 (i do not agree) at least put it in rank 7. This tank has bad thermals, bad optics, very slow and the armor is far from reliable, so i think it should stay where it is, it’s exactly the same as the Merkava mk2 B, cause the additional composite armor does absolute nothing
Mode: Ground RB
Vehicle: Merkava mk.2D
Change: 10.0 > 9.7
Reasoning: Unlike Shiir or AMX-40 it has neither protection, nor mobility. Compared to tech-tree merkavas that are 0.3 BR lower it only has better HEAT protection, but almost nobody uses HEAT rounds at this BR.
this is not wholly true, while the weather is clear, type 81 can easily lock and kill even strike uav’s from 9km away.
it has contrast lock allowing for further lock than what the missile can normally do. this only works against a clear sky, if there is a mountain/trees/thick clouds on the background its not going to work.
type 93 & strela also have access to this feature, allowing the strela to frontally lock at 7+km away instead of just its stated 3.2 km.
agreed. also if it is put up to 10.0 gaijin should atleast give it a better round too to compensate.
that certain demographic only flock to good vehicles like of of-40 mtca, itpsv, etc.
its funny how ‘they’ flocking to the amx-40 is one of the clearest signs to tell you that it is a very good vehicle.