Mode : Ground realistic battles.
Vehicle : T64B
Br 9.7 > 10.0
Reason: the T64B has good optics, though lackign thermals. Decent speed and mobility bar the reverse rate for the 9.7 BR.
On top of this it has effective composites and of course the 125mm 3BM42 which is a good round even for 10.7 tanks.
The fact it stays at 9.7 while all the other 9.7s have moved to 10.0 is quite strange
(shir 2 included which has access to a round with over 70 penetration more.)
Yeah… Or for me in SB…it being the same BR as the Hunter F58 with CMs and 0.7 BR higher than the Belgium F6
Already commented on it, but forgot to mention, the Type 81C only gets a lock range of ~6km. Literal 9.3 missile AA (Santal) while worse in Gs, has the same lock range.
Does an AA with the same lock range as a 9.3 vehicle belong at 11.7 even if its missiles are fanstastic? Not to mention that same 9.3 AA has an actual radar for giving a heads up for vehicles?
Again, please don’t raise its BR, it genuinely does not deserve such a change.
Agreed entirely, incredibly silly change. No radar, 6km all aspect missiles.
French Santal at 9.3 has 12G missiles (significantly lower yes) but all aspect locks at 6km and a radar.
Mode: Ground Realistic Battles
Aircraft: J37C
Change: 11.0 → 10.7
Reasoning: Given the high CM amounts of CAS planes at this BR, and the potency of SPAA systems, the J37C is the only usable CAP platform at this BR range, however bringing it in your lineup exposes you to a full uptier to 12.0, a death sentence for your normally 10.7 lineup. The J37C has only weak unguided rockets for ground attack, and not many of them, and will make no noticeable impact against ground targets, but will allow sweden to counter CAS with competent CAP.
ill do u one better why did the mig 21 mf and smt get moved down to 10.3 last br change?
I’d agree if they fixed the reload speed to the correct 6.0 sec load time
my suggestion:
Mode: Air Realistic
Aircraft: F/A-18A
BR: 12.3 → 12.7
Armament changes: +Give Aim-7P
+Have the full ability to take 6 Aim-7s+2 9L
+Guided munitions (mavericks)
I think F/A-18A is too powerful at 12.3. I think it would be better suited at 12.7, but with similar armament as F/A-18C Early (4 wing slots for Aim7, guided ground munitions). I don’t think just for having three hornets at three different BRs we should have the F/A-18A facing 11.3 jets.
no, it has access to supperior mobility, armour, roughly the same HP/PT and a substantially better round.
Roughly equal optics as well.
If the AMX40, and Shir 2 are going to 10.0, the T64B should as well.
Btw I fired a talisman on it ages ago cause how good it is, one of my fav russian tanks period. I still believe its under BR’d
i swear to god we need a #stopuptieringisraelivehicles because i see an uptier left and right but still no armor at all
for god’s sake, give it some armor, or make it go down in BR, its stupid that alot of tanks can pen the merkava even 3-4 BR’s lower sometimes even more.
bro i have tried the 2 and it literally changes nothing, the German version can’t face T-72 without a stab
TBF most aircrafts at 12.3 are a slop and the hornet is only marginally overpowered. There were posts about it above.
GR.7: subsonic radarless CAS platform that does have AIM-9Ls
GR.4: a literal flying brick and basically cant do anything other than bombing in air battles
JH-7A: for a better FM trades all IRCCM missiles
K2K: a phantom with all aspects
EJK: a phantom with all aspects as well
T-64B should move like the others MBT in the same battle rating (10.0).
T-72M/A should move up too, if the Merkava are moving it. (9.7)
Belgepanzer 57, same way. (9.7)
T-72AV should move 10.7 minimum like others premium MBT. ( and here you’re missing something important : thermal is Gen 2/3, with nato tank hunting capacity (Commander/gunner can shot).
the 9.3 merkavas and the megach 6C/ gal batash are actually pretty damn good 9.3 (now 9.7) tanks man.
only issue ive got with the mk1b and 2b is the optics not having better zoom.
Good dart, decent mobility , amazing turret traverse, LWS & LRF and god knows how many smokes
Here’s the thing though, that 6.0 sec reload is the irl reload. The shir 2 which I love, should stay 9.7, I don’t see it as a problem there.
The mobility is pretty even for the shir / T64B
But I feel the AMX is going up because certain demographics that are known to cheat, like to use it in mass because it’s a good vehicle. I have no experience in it personally, but I’ve seen it do some consistently good work.
T64B I agree as well.
The T72AV also has absolutely amazing optics and is arguably a better sniper than the 2a4 and M1 abrams.
armours a hit or miss though
what
Yes decompression would be good, but I also believe the T-72B (10.3) should go back down to 10.0
Have you ever seen when good ground vehicle events come out? And suddenly there’s a lot of AMX-40s used by certain demographics?? That cheat?
Genuinely the T64B has more merit moving to 10.0 before the shir 2 on the fact that it has that 3bm42.
the Shir two and it should stay 9.7, or both move to 10.0, and shir get the L23A1 round.
*no 10.0 should have to face off against 11.0 with a damn 192 angle pen round.
Yeah I think the top speed goes to the T64 but the getting to its top speed goes to the Shir, However the reverse is disgracefully bad on T64B
The AMX40 I have it, its a nice tank, like a worse 2k
Has a slightly worse dart, the 20mm does worse overall, the speeds comparable but the overall mobility / turret and gun traverse goes to the 2k.
it does get gen 1thermals, but has no zoom function just fixed magnification