Planned Battle Rating changes for April 2025

I’d move the Object 140 to 8.7 all modes. The apds on it absolutely shreds everything it sees.

3 Likes

Nothing update.

Object 279 9.0 → 9.7

It’s more mobile than most MBTs at its tier, has a better cannon, much better survivability and a strong HMG on top of that. It’s better than the T-64A/T-72A at 9.3 so it should be higher.

8 Likes

Mode: Air Realistic Battles

Aircraft: A6M5 Hei (JPN)

5.0 → 4.7

By far the worst A6M5, being significantly heavier than other variants when those were already underpowered. Its climb rate and speed are both the WORST at its BR.

7 Likes

Mode: RB
Vehicle: Q-5A/L
BR Change: 10.0-9.7
Reasoning:
it’s unreasonable to move planes that basically MIG-19 with flares to 10.0, fighting with F-4 and MIG-21

7 Likes

I still believe that the B29 and tu-4 should be lower by 0.3 .
Also , we may still need an Air top tier decompression to 14.3 . Only to leave 11.7 12.0 phantoms and mig23s in peace instead of facing Su33s and F15s/F18s all the time .
I am not gonna mention anything about naval since it neeeds a whole gameplay rework more than just BR changes to be fixed .
Speaking of GRB , i think everything is fine except for the compression around 5.3 / 6.3 and the need of modern AA systems to counter the OPed top tier cas

6 Likes

Replace the AI that changes the BR, it’s not funny anymore

6 Likes

KV-1S is going to 4.3 but the KV-1E and KV-1B (Germany) is staying at 4.0? They should go up too!!!

15 Likes

The 140 is a non issue for any tank of its BR. Why should it be only 0.3 lower than the tank that does everything the 140 can but 100 times better?

1 Like

Its still a joke the HAC with better armament(which it shouldnt have) and asgard armor(which it shouldnt have) be placed atvthe same br as the UHT.
The truth is a bunch of the HAC armament should be removed as stated in the manual, pr at least them being added to the UHT like the open reports that are acknowledged since 2 years.

But currently the HAC deserves a higher br then the UHT since uts better in asll aspects

1 Like

Imagine thinking the T55AMD1 isnt toxic

2 Likes

A-4N Ayit 9.3 → 10.0 (Air RB)

Please just move it up already. It’s carried by extremely broken missiles on an already good platform. I’m tired of seeing it in MiGs and Sabres.

9 Likes

Yoooo Finally?

XP-50s deserved it to gets removed air spawn.

7 Likes

Mode:GRB
Vehicle:2S6
BR Change: 10.7→11.0
Reason:The type 81(c) has had many BR increases while the 2S6 probably has not had any BR increases at all. Why is the BR not going up when we have radar, missiles, and machine guns?

8 Likes

Centurion Mk3 7.7 → 7.3

It’s worse than the Cent Mk5/1 and Caernarvon yet sits at the same BR. Its APDS js garbage and can’t even reliably pen a Tiger 2 while itself being very easy to pen.

10 Likes

Mode: Air Realistic Battles

Aircraft: J6K1 (JPN)

6.7 → 6.0

An old, rare event vehicle played by extremely skilled players has caused this late WW2 fighter’s BR to rise to the level of prop fighters manufactured and deployed well after WW2 ended, with far better performance characteristics.

20 Likes

Mode: Air Realistic Battles

Aircraft: (US) F4F-4

Change: 3.0 → 2.7

Reasoning: While both aircraft have different powerplants with only a 100 hp difference, the Martlet Mk IV (a Lend-Lease F4F-4 for Britain) sits at 2.7 while the American F4F-4 remains at 3.0. Admittedly, its armor makes it fairly survivable, and its firepower is respectable. However, it’s not as fast as its contemporaries and bleeds energy rapidly in sustained turn fights. The fact that it shares the same battle rating as the F4U-1A (USMC) is particularly questionable, as the F4U-1A outperforms it in nearly every measurable category.

5 Likes

Shenyang F-5 9.3 → 9.0

A MiG-17 with afterburner is, of course, struggling in all the 10.0 and 10.3 matches it gets. The previous BR changes made these matches very common. The planes it faces simply outdo it in terms of flight performance by too big a margin and the missiles they have cannot be dodged. Unplayable at 9.3 currently.

12 Likes

Mode: Air Simulator Battles

Aircraft: XP-55

3.0 → 3.3

I feel it would do well with a higher BR jump, but as it is a premium let’s play it piece-meal to see if going higher would hurt it too much. Feel it’d do fine at 4.0 but, piecemeal.

Reasoning: Very small silhouette and highly maneuverable, but suffers from low survivability and visibility. None the less, it is more capable than its peers at 3.0.

3 Likes

id love if in air RB 13.0 got a bit uncompressed like the ice tornado F3 late AV8B and jas 37di being moved up
and the other 14.0/13.7s be moved up so we could give jets at 12.7 more breathing space for crap boxes like the mig29
also move the Finnish hornet to 13.7 or please give it HMD no hmd in 14.0 is pretty annoying and hindering

1 Like