Planned Battle Rating changes for April 2025

Skill issue moment.

1 Like

im not surprised at all, you see 5 of them at the start of every match.

but its true, f3h cant do anything against f86k or supermystere players that know how to manage their energy.

XM800T is a faster smaller Brady with a worst gun and no missiles. First it was 7.7 now 8.0 and now it’s going to 8.3 what next? 8.7?

possibly,
the 20mm is just plain better than the horrid bradley 25mm.
it would be interesting, if they added apfsds to the 20mm.

1 Like

see this bug report pls, and share
the tws pd physics are failing to detect

Air realistic.
Mig-15

8.0 - 8.3.
Reason:
It’s superior to the other 8.0s in every way and this needs to be addressed.

7 Likes

What light tanks do, and which ones are hard for the Kv-1E to kill?

Air RB & Air SIM
JH-7A. 12.3 → 11.3

The JH-7A’s air armament is weak for its BR, the JH-7A air armament and flight performance is comparable to the SU-24 and F111F/F-111C.

Ground RB
Antelope. 10.3 → 9.7.

The Antelope has a disappointing performance, both on the missile and on the launch platform, the TC-1L low count and poor seeker (low all-aspect lock range and poor IRCCM) makes the Antelope a undesired choice between it, the PGZ04A and the PGZ09.

1 Like

Ground RB
ZSL92. 6.3 → 7.3.
The ZSL92 has a poor performance as SPAA, the low ammo, low cannon elevation and large silhouette makes it very bad for the SPAA class, it should reclassified as a Light tank and receive its APDS belt. The ZSL92 should be a chinese BTR-80A/Type 87 RCV (P) equivalent.

2 Likes

ARB and Naval main gives his opinion. This might be the worst BR change ask in these suggestions i have seen. Saying a leopard 2 hull is only slightly better chieftain hull is a lack of game knowledge i cant comprehend.

Your arguments are so bad.



1 Like

It is a good tank, OP? No. Anyone who has any level of intelligence can kill it.

If I really wanted to seal club, the T29 is where it’s at. Or the T14 4.7

1 Like

I can assure you that it isnt. If the T-54 (1951) is 8.0, the TO-55 (which is stabilized) should be 8.3 and the T-55A should be 8.7 because it is both stabilized gun and has decent APFSDS. it is a natural progression of capabilities that deserve an increase in BR.

What I think is worse that at its current BR of 8.3, that means that tanks with a BR of 7.3 (tanks such as the M47)have to face off against it and quite frankly that disparity in tech is a bit much. I think a finer BR gradient is needed for this area because tank tech jumps considerably such as the quick addition of stabilizers, laser range finders, APFSDS, composite armors ect… all within 8.0-9.0. Tanks underneath them just get dumped on in the all too common uptier. Natually the same should go for other nations, obviously not just russia.

For instance the M60 is 8.0, M60A1 AOS is 8.3 (stabilizer but not APFSDS) and the M60A1 RISE (both stabilizer and APFSDS).

thats my argument for it anyway.

It is extremely OP when its armour is as good as it is, at the BR that it is.

What makes the Churchill VII worthy of being 0.7 higher? What about it only being 0.3 higher than the base Kv-1, despite it having 25% more armour on a huge part of it? And that 25% is good enough to not block all Sherman’s, reliably block Panzers, and make it difficult to pen with everything else.

I think that you’re incredibly biased, and that you cant see objective stats.

3 Likes

Don’t bother arguing with someone who is biased enough to dismiss the reality and their own performance.

3 Likes

It very much depends on matchmaking, it’s not 4.7 Jumbo levels of overpowered and can be dealt with, but by no means is balanced either. It’s more so extremely annoying to face and unhealthy for the game rather than overpowered. It is a prime example of vehicle that can only be actually balanced with proper BR decompression.

Right now, without decomopression it’s a question of whether you leave it at 4.0 and let it continue being nuisance for everyone else, or throw it into 4.3 and make it share the fate of KV-1 ZiS, IS-4M, IS-6, 76 jumbo and alike.

AH-64A 11.7-11.3 GRB

AGM114 was overvalued, not only AH64, and don’t forget that mh60l at 11.3 with MAWs and AGM114K, meanwhile the AH64A just has AGM114B

quite ironic that the guy defending the KV-1/KV-B is in the -RBIAS- squadron, just sayin