Mode: Air Realistic Battles
Aircraft: Mirage F1C-200(And analogues from the branch)
Change: 12,0 → 11,7 or 11,3
Reasoning:
Matra Super 530F air-to-air missiles are not competitors to AIM-7M/F/E2/E, R-23R/24R/27R/27ER. There are only 2 of them, when the enemy has from two to four radar missiles. They do not have the option - Front-angle capture on the ground background. That is, it will fly into almost any dipole defense. It has only two Matra Magic 2 infrared air-to-air missiles, which are only suitable for a short distance in the rear hemisphere. Which is not equivalent against 2/4 radar air-to-air missiles and 2/4/6 infrared air-to-air missiles (to be honest, 12.0 opponents mostly have only infrared missiles aimed at the rear, and again there are more of them). In addition, from this combat rating, the main opponent has the ability to hit the target thanks to the helmet (HMS). In addition, most battles take place at the bottom of the combat rating 13.0, where the Phantom still has a chance to fight thanks to its missiles and their quantity and quality, and the Mirage has practically no chance. In terms of flight characteristics, the closest aircraft is the Tornado IDS WTD61. Its dynamics and maximum speed will be slightly better, but it has worse maneuverability and slightly worse missiles.
1 Like
even the 6.0 m18 cant pen it anywhere execept millimeters on the turret, if angled correctly
it has very poor energy retention. super mystere & f86k can turn much better in a sustained turn.
XM800T to 8.3 =( same B.R. as Bradley
1 Like
what vehicles have better armor at lower br? not ARL at least. it dies to a pz iv at every angle, which is not true for kv-1e/b.
its strange that you dont think its op, but you yourself are overperforming with it very much compared to your other vehicles. are you really that scared that gaijin will nerf your favourite sealclubber?
3 Likes
im not surprised at all, you see 5 of them at the start of every match.
but its true, f3h cant do anything against f86k or supermystere players that know how to manage their energy.
XM800T is a faster smaller Brady with a worst gun and no missiles. First it was 7.7 now 8.0 and now it’s going to 8.3 what next? 8.7?
possibly,
the 20mm is just plain better than the horrid bradley 25mm.
it would be interesting, if they added apfsds to the 20mm.
1 Like
see this bug report pls, and share
the tws pd physics are failing to detect
Air realistic.
Mig-15
8.0 - 8.3.
Reason:
It’s superior to the other 8.0s in every way and this needs to be addressed.
7 Likes
What light tanks do, and which ones are hard for the Kv-1E to kill?
Air RB & Air SIM
JH-7A. 12.3 → 11.3
The JH-7A’s air armament is weak for its BR, the JH-7A air armament and flight performance is comparable to the SU-24 and F111F/F-111C.
Ground RB
Antelope. 10.3 → 9.7.
The Antelope has a disappointing performance, both on the missile and on the launch platform, the TC-1L low count and poor seeker (low all-aspect lock range and poor IRCCM) makes the Antelope a undesired choice between it, the PGZ04A and the PGZ09.
1 Like
Ground RB
ZSL92. 6.3 → 7.3.
The ZSL92 has a poor performance as SPAA, the low ammo, low cannon elevation and large silhouette makes it very bad for the SPAA class, it should reclassified as a Light tank and receive its APDS belt. The ZSL92 should be a chinese BTR-80A/Type 87 RCV (P) equivalent.
2 Likes
ARB and Naval main gives his opinion. This might be the worst BR change ask in these suggestions i have seen. Saying a leopard 2 hull is only slightly better chieftain hull is a lack of game knowledge i cant comprehend.
Your arguments are so bad.
1 Like
It is a good tank, OP? No. Anyone who has any level of intelligence can kill it.
If I really wanted to seal club, the T29 is where it’s at. Or the T14 4.7
1 Like
I can assure you that it isnt. If the T-54 (1951) is 8.0, the TO-55 (which is stabilized) should be 8.3 and the T-55A should be 8.7 because it is both stabilized gun and has decent APFSDS. it is a natural progression of capabilities that deserve an increase in BR.
What I think is worse that at its current BR of 8.3, that means that tanks with a BR of 7.3 (tanks such as the M47)have to face off against it and quite frankly that disparity in tech is a bit much. I think a finer BR gradient is needed for this area because tank tech jumps considerably such as the quick addition of stabilizers, laser range finders, APFSDS, composite armors ect… all within 8.0-9.0. Tanks underneath them just get dumped on in the all too common uptier. Natually the same should go for other nations, obviously not just russia.
For instance the M60 is 8.0, M60A1 AOS is 8.3 (stabilizer but not APFSDS) and the M60A1 RISE (both stabilizer and APFSDS).
thats my argument for it anyway.
