Yes however the different of the type 90 and leopard 2a4 would be 1 instead of 0.7, whilst the difference between toptier and the type 90 stays the same, thus relieving pressure whilst keeping balance.
That’s what I’m advocating, yes.
Except over BR’d vehicles like the Leclerc, ZTZ99A, Challies and Ariete would have a spot in the Meta.
Please do not push the FV 4030 up to 10.0. Uptiers to 11.0 would be devastating, ruining the unique vehicle.
2 Likes
who cares. It’s still good, and the mobility debuff isn’t relevant considering how you have to play the tank defensively. Don’t agree with this take. Chieftain mk3 is superior to the M60AOS in almost every regards but reload and mobility… only slightly. Sometimes an upgrade is so minimal that it doesn’t justify a br change, and the cheiftain mk3/5 fits that.
It has challenger mk2 armour, just give it a better round with the br increase. the challengers are great tanks, below average mobility (still fast enough to do anything you need to do in a ground rb game) for superior armour protection.
How about move the Vampire, Venom, and Sea Venom down to 7.0, 7.7, and ,7.7?
1 Like
idk why people are defending such a blantely overpowered tank. It get’s 10.7 levels of protection at an entire br lower. Whether its british or russian, OP tanks need to be balanced.
2 Likes
Might be unpopular, but i believe the MiG-23ML, MLA and MLD should be moved up in BR.
MiG-23ML/MiG-23MLA/MiG-23MLD
Air Realistic Battles
BR: 11.7 → 12.0
Why? Simply the R24R missile is just too good and doesn’t belong potentially fighting 10.7 aircraft. Instead of moving other aircraft like the J35XS down in BR because they suffer from the ML i feel like the MiG-23ML should be instead be moved up.
I feel like the Mirage F1C gets that treatment because of its missile, the Magic 2. Its another (probably worse) airframe than the ML bumped up in BR because of it being able to carry two great missiles.
2 Likes
Its a chieftain hull remember
The ML and MLA are not able to move up because of how poor their RWR is. The MLD would be fine at 12.0.
It’s unreasonable to put them to 12.0 with an RWR as bad as SPO-10.
1 Like
I don’t think there are that many treats that it cant pick up, but still it’s a valid argument.
It is not, that’s just a common bit of miss information due to the Shir 2 using the same suspension.
What’s funny is the jumbo is still a bully, and hardly saw any nerfs.
The obj. 279 may have been under br’d at 8.3, but 8.7 was well rounded. It is not hard to fight.
The KV-1E shares the same weaknesses as its predecessor, so it makes little sense to be so “OP” it’s good, don’t get me wrong, but not 4.3 material unless it gets a new shell.
lol not even! People who shoot quick and don’t aim are the ones having the problem. It takes all of one second to hit the gun and it’s very easy to disable, which usually kills 2-3 crew, and it’s forced to retreat. Hit the drivers port and it’s 1 tapped.
Even it’s angled, the turret is still easily penned
I don’t agree with the FV 4030 going to 10.0. Mainly because Britain has no line up there and the FV 4030 has a very weak lower plate. I get its a challenger prototype but it would be just like what they did with the rooikat 105 they put it up with no lineup other then the FV 4030
Why screw over japan? we finally had a line up at 11.3 but now you have to go and mess it up.
I do not agree with the tkxp and type 81c getting moved up.
1 Like
Mode: Air Realistic Battles
Aircraft: Phantom FGR.2 (Great Britain)
Change: 12.0 → 11.7. Or keep at 12.0 if:
Reasoning: The Phantom should stay at 12.0 if it recieves its historical AIM 9L instead of its current AIM 9G. If the AIM 9L is not added, it should be reduced to 11.7. Only AIM 9G in the potential of a 13.0 uptier against common 30g+ all aspect missiles its balanced. Have a worse RWR, and lack the Agile Eagle slats.
11 Likes
+1 I still do not get how the 2s38 is literally a full BR lower than the HSTVL…
give up brother its never gonna happen, I’ve tried every BR change to get all the British phantoms down to 11.7 or giving them the 9L but they just wont listen. Guess they still think the skyflash is an Aim-7F equivalent missile, quite sad. It’s even worse now that the F/A-18A is 12.3 with 9L’s/7M’s, a better airframe and a better radar. Like how would giving a worse airframe the same missiles at a slightly lower BR be an issue.
2 Likes