Planned Battle Rating changes for April 2025

Can’t agree more, kurnass 2000 should be 11.7

4 Likes

Mode: Ground Realistic Battles

Vehicle: A 32A Lansen

BR Change: 9.0 > 8.7

The major reason why the A 32A was 9.3/9.0 was because of how it performed in air battles when seperate Battle Ratings for different game modes weren’t a thing.

Compared to the A-4 Skyhawks (specifically the A-4E Early and Ayit) of which are much slower than the A 32A, they still feature some type of guided weaponry, aswell as flare countermeasures. The A 32A does not have access to any type of guided weaponry guided at the moment.

and like the Skyhawks mentioned above, they have recieved a seperate BR rating because of their weaponry, and the A 32A could benefit from a seperate BR placement aswell.

8 Likes

That thing barely holds itself at 11.3 already lmao

1 Like

I’m waiting gaijin add AGM-114L for US Army AH-64D

2 Likes

The ZT3A2 has changed a lot since it was introduced.
The missile in particular got faster and penetrates further.
This along with a really high gunner’s viewpoint and good optical zoom,
a BR increase to 8.7 in GRB I think would be appropriate.

4 Likes

Mode: GRB

Vehicle: Italian Sherman VC

BR Change: from 5.0 to 4.7

Reasons: Despite having superior ammunition compared to its British counterpart, it lacks additional armor, has poor mobility just like the previous one, and is constantly uptiered at 6.0 due to the lack of BR decompression.

Mode: Ground Realistic Battles

Vehicle: T-90A

BR Change: 11.0 > 10.7 (take away 3BM60)

Reasoning:
This tank has no reason being 11.0, just remove the top dart of 3BM60 and move to 10.7 same as T-90S Bhishma.

10 Likes

Mode: Air realistic

Aircraft: Mirage 2000D-R1 (and mirage 2000D-RMV)

Br: 12.3 (12.7) → 12.0 (12.0)

The air rb performance is roughly the same as the mirage f1 (12.0) (the airframe is good, but the gun placement is not optimal) and there is no reason for these aircrafts to be in a separate br, because their air-to-air capabilities are equal.

8 Likes

unless they find a way to give the type 81 a radar it should not be moved up in br

13 Likes

GRB, 2S38 10.3 → 10.7/11.0.

Ah mobile IFV with a big autocannon that can penetrate MBTs as well as double as a great anti air with its proxy rounds. It is an anti everything vehicle.

It does not compare performance wise to competitors at the same tier like Puma, Namer, Strf 9040C and performs a good bit better then them.

Every single time it gets brought up that the 2S38 should receive a br bump with the last one even getting 176 likes, but it doesnt get addressed

Zusammenfassung

Yes it did get a “nerf” in the sense of the internals getting modelled more, but it was just as much a buff cause it now has an unlimited ready rack with a gun that doesnt overheat

It should finaly get its br bump it deserves

61 Likes

Mode: Air Realistic Battles

Aircraft: Spitfire LF Mk9

5.7 → 6.3

The LF Mk9 is also one of the most dangerous fighters at 5.7, with THE BEST climbrate at this BR, very strong firepower with currently the best 20mm cannons below jet tiers, and a turn rate that is UNMATCHED apart from a few A6M Zeros and the A7M Reppus (which are significantly worse in every other way).

5 Likes

Namer 30 to 11.0?
Merkava m2d to 10.0?
Gaijin rly hates israel bro wth

12 Likes

apart from the “money” problem, i’d love to finally see that tank get a BR raise.

both Pumas and the Namer should be lower and 2S38 could easily be 11.3

15 Likes

Sorry for my misunderstanding.
You were talking about how it performs in arcade and i was thinking about realistic.
I dont play arcade much so i dont know about situation with japanese planes.

Mode: GRB

Vehicle: Panzer IV H.

BR Change: 3.7 to 4.0 and move to Rank III.

Reasons: Simple, is very good for 2.7 tanks. and is more needed in rank 3 so whit this changes all wins.

18 Likes

Mode: Air RB

Aircraft: B6N2 Model 12

2.3 > 2.0

It’s a B6N2a with weaker defensive weapons at the same BR. While it could be problematic due to potentially being able to outspeed most biplanes, it also doesn’t have much of a reason to have to deal with 3.3 planes. Plus, for Ground RB lineups, Japan only has the D4Y1 and Ki 109 at 2.0, so the B6N2 could provide another option to that bracket. Not to mention, it makes the progression between the Tenzan variants smoother, going from the B6N1 at 1.7, to the B6N2 at 2.0, and ending with the B6N2a at 2.3.

6 Likes

Aircraft: F-104G (China)

Game mode: Air Realistic

BR change: 10.7 → 10.3

Reason: It’s the Starfighter without countermeasures, with only 4x AIM-9J and a bit better engine in comparison with F-104J. This jet should be a sidegrade to F-104J, not the downgrade due to higher BR.

17 Likes

GRB

  • Su-17 and 22M3:
    all variants should go to 10.0

  • Su-17 and 22M4:
    all variants should go to 10.7

10 Likes

Q5L/A 9.7 They do not have missiles for attack, and their only attack weapon is two 23mm short barreled machine guns, which cannot survive at 10.0BR

JH7A Give the IRCCM missile, there are already a large number of IRCCM missiles at its location, and JH7A also requires IRCCM missiles for self-defense

J8F The reason is the same as above

shenyang F5 9.3→9.0 Gaijin It seems like I’ve forgotten

17 Likes