Planned Battle Rating changes for April 2025

Official News, Development Blogs and Updates
1719

I’m fairly sure I already did in that thread, just move the ARL-44 up too if you think it’s so good.

There is just zero justification for the Kv-1E/B to be 4.0. They have incredibly good armour, acceptable mobility/gun handling, and weak gun, with incredibly good one shot potential. Ffs a sherman can’t even pen the sides of them in some parts unless its flat on, and Sherman’s are excellent tanks. That’s also ignoring the fact that angling makes you nearly invulnerable to anything but a TD with a powerful gun.

Look at my stats in the E, and you’ll see that it has a 90% winrate, and 4:1+ KD. Nothing else I own even comes close, and anything that does is another notorious seal clubbing vehicle.

1 Like
1720

Yeah, confirmation here, the first 4030/3, AKA the Shir 2, that was built was in 1977, the program was canned in 1979, 6 years before L23 entered service in 1985.

1721

MiG-29 flight model is almost perfectly accurate to the manual.

1722

Yes. It has much better flight performance and a better loadout. It is objectively better than the Bison with the config you suggested, and it’s BR should reflect that.

1 Like
1723

A R-72R1+R-73 MiG-29A should be fine at 12.7, and tbf, id felt the 9.13 and DDR 9.12A should be the same

1 Like
1724
  1. The B is better since it doesn’t face German guns.
  2. The ARL is lower br and arguably better.
  3. If it were to go up in br, it would need a better shell. It already can see Vk-30s and can’t do anything to them frontally
1725

What is an R72?

1726

My IS-2, IS3, 6, and 4, T-10A all cannot pen a maus except point blank side on.

This is not the same case with the KV-1E or B many tanks can kill both. If one of these is “better” it’s the B as it doesn’t have to face German guns.

1727

So we can’t move up the ARL too then? Terrible argument lmao
And it wouldn’t be a problem to give it the solid shot other KV-1s have.

1728

That’s an issue with the Vk 3002 being undertiered.

You listed an overteired 6.7, and 3 other tanks that outperform the maus in several ways, such as with a better armour layout or mobility. The Is-2 and 3 are also at a lower BR.

The same vehicle shouldn’t get a lower BR just because it in a different tree.

2 Likes
1729

I mean R27

1730

Sherman II from 3.7 to 3.3.

Remove ahistorical late-war American APCR round.

1 Like
1731

The amount of people who seem to think this is crazy… Sherman II for example.

1732

Pretty sure the ARL has a far better gun

1733

Ok just completely ignore what I said then

1734

3 other tanks that out preform the maus? lol okayyyy if you say so.

IS-3 not even close.
IS-4 still worse than a maus but closer.
t-10A is pretty much a semi stabalized maus butt with worse armor.

1735

XM-1 needs to be either lowered in BR or have its round changed to M774 since you all seriously gimped it using a false shell performance report.

1736

Fix Merkava Tank armor or lower them all to 11.3 BR.

How is the tank with the best crew survival rate in real life such a mess in game.

1737

USA
Mode: Air Realistic Battles
Vehicle: F-105D
Change: 10.0>9.7
Reasoning:no Flares, ,no maneuverability

Britain
Mode: Air Realistic Battles
Vehicle: Buccaneer S.2
Change：9.3>9.0
Reasoning:no speed,no maneuverability,as thurkey

China
Mode: Air Realistic Battles
Vehicle ： J-7D
Change ：10.7>11.0
Reasoning: BR10.7 have 4 PL-5B

Mode: Air Realistic Battles
Vehicle：Q-5L
Change:9.7>10.3
Reasoning:have Flares,Universal ballistic computer,multi band rwr, have Explosive Mass 60kg=213kg super incendiary bomb

Sweden
Mode: Air Realistic Battles
Vehicle：J35XS
Change: 10.3>10,7
Reasoning:BR 10.3 have 6 RB24J

3 Likes
1738

Sorry that we can’t agree but you have no clue what you’re talking about.
Only bad thing about it is that 9.3 Magach isn’t going up as well with them.

1 Like