MiG-29 flight model is almost perfectly accurate to the manual.
Yes. It has much better flight performance and a better loadout. It is objectively better than the Bison with the config you suggested, and it’s BR should reflect that.
1 Like
A R-72R1+R-73 MiG-29A should be fine at 12.7, and tbf, id felt the 9.13 and DDR 9.12A should be the same
1 Like
- The B is better since it doesn’t face German guns.
- The ARL is lower br and arguably better.
- If it were to go up in br, it would need a better shell. It already can see Vk-30s and can’t do anything to them frontally
What is an R72?
My IS-2, IS3, 6, and 4, T-10A all cannot pen a maus except point blank side on.
This is not the same case with the KV-1E or B many tanks can kill both. If one of these is “better” it’s the B as it doesn’t have to face German guns.
So we can’t move up the ARL too then? Terrible argument lmao
And it wouldn’t be a problem to give it the solid shot other KV-1s have.
That’s an issue with the Vk 3002 being undertiered.
You listed an overteired 6.7, and 3 other tanks that outperform the maus in several ways, such as with a better armour layout or mobility. The Is-2 and 3 are also at a lower BR.
The same vehicle shouldn’t get a lower BR just because it in a different tree.
2 Likes
I mean R27
Sherman II from 3.7 to 3.3.
Remove ahistorical late-war American APCR round.
1 Like
The amount of people who seem to think this is crazy… Sherman II for example.
Pretty sure the ARL has a far better gun
Ok just completely ignore what I said then
3 other tanks that out preform the maus? lol okayyyy if you say so.
IS-3 not even close.
IS-4 still worse than a maus but closer.
t-10A is pretty much a semi stabalized maus butt with worse armor.
XM-1 needs to be either lowered in BR or have its round changed to M774 since you all seriously gimped it using a false shell performance report.
Fix Merkava Tank armor or lower them all to 11.3 BR.
How is the tank with the best crew survival rate in real life such a mess in game.
USA
Mode: Air Realistic Battles
Vehicle: F-105D
Change: 10.0>9.7
Reasoning:no Flares, ,no maneuverability
Britain
Mode: Air Realistic Battles
Vehicle: Buccaneer S.2
Change：9.3>9.0
Reasoning:no speed,no maneuverability,as thurkey
China
Mode: Air Realistic Battles
Vehicle ： J-7D
Change ：10.7>11.0
Reasoning: BR10.7 have 4 PL-5B
Mode: Air Realistic Battles
Vehicle：Q-5L
Change:9.7>10.3
Reasoning:have Flares,Universal ballistic computer,multi band rwr, have Explosive Mass 60kg=213kg super incendiary bomb
Sweden
Mode: Air Realistic Battles
Vehicle：J35XS
Change: 10.3>10,7
Reasoning:BR 10.3 have 6 RB24J
3 Likes
Sorry that we can’t agree but you have no clue what you’re talking about.
Only bad thing about it is that 9.3 Magach isn’t going up as well with them.
1 Like
ARL: better frontal armor, 7.5 sec load time 125mm pen. Downside? AP
(3.7)
KV-1E: better side armor, 6.3 sec reload, 87mm pen. Downside? Pen, reverse, small weak points all over.
(4.0)
Seems like there’s an oddity here.
No way. You must not have played this machine, it bleeds it’s speed like no tomorrow on even the most careful maneuver. It has no energy retention whatsoever and the gun is extremely difficult to use. The 6 missiles is the only thing that makes this machine worthwhile.
1 Like