Ground RB, Ozelot. 9.7 > 9.3. Two issues would be fixed:
The ZSU-23-4M4 and PGZ04A are both at 9.3 and not only have IRCCM missiles but also proper radar and guns. The SANTAL is also at 9.3 with 12 missiles and much better ones. Therefore, the Ozelot should at least have the same BR, but not a higher one.
With the BR decompression from the last BR changes, 9.3 becomes a playable BR, but the best AA for a German lineup would be the Gepard (8.3), which is underwhelming at 9.3.
P.S.
If you think the Ozelot is too good for 9.3 then ALL missile-AA vehicles should be raised at least to 9.7.
Even the Type 93 has a significant advantage over the Ozelot with its contrast mode which makes it possible to attack helicopters before they have killed your whole team. Non-contrast-mode AA can only lock helicopters at about 2,4km while the helicopters around that BR have 3,75-4km range. Even AA guns have a longer effective range (IF YOU WOULD HAVE GUNS).
Would it be a worse offender than the 12.3 MiG 21 Bison with its R-73, R-21R and R-21T1 loadout?
i get that compression is a huge issue, but keep in mind that the flight model is still nerfed heavily, and at 12.7 it meets some real monsters in uptiers that just hopelessly outperform it.
I would prefer an FM un-nerf, historical loadout, and 12.7, but that’s more of a suggestion than a br change request.
I’m fairly sure I already did in that thread, just move the ARL-44 up too if you think it’s so good.
There is just zero justification for the Kv-1E/B to be 4.0. They have incredibly good armour, acceptable mobility/gun handling, and weak gun, with incredibly good one shot potential. Ffs a sherman can’t even pen the sides of them in some parts unless its flat on, and Sherman’s are excellent tanks. That’s also ignoring the fact that angling makes you nearly invulnerable to anything but a TD with a powerful gun.
Look at my stats in the E, and you’ll see that it has a 90% winrate, and 4:1+ KD. Nothing else I own even comes close, and anything that does is another notorious seal clubbing vehicle.
Yeah, confirmation here, the first 4030/3, AKA the Shir 2, that was built was in 1977, the program was canned in 1979, 6 years before L23 entered service in 1985.
Yes. It has much better flight performance and a better loadout. It is objectively better than the Bison with the config you suggested, and it’s BR should reflect that.
That’s an issue with the Vk 3002 being undertiered.
You listed an overteired 6.7, and 3 other tanks that outperform the maus in several ways, such as with a better armour layout or mobility. The Is-2 and 3 are also at a lower BR.
The same vehicle shouldn’t get a lower BR just because it in a different tree.