if i recall the ARH SAM-1C is in the files, though i dunno why gaijin isnt adding
1 Like
Already planned
Idk I think I’d like it at 9.7 with L23
Oh lol
Sidam 25 mistral 9.7 → 9.3
Basically, also I find the dozer blade actually quite handy for the Mk2
When combined with this:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/m22cZZxaNPXJ
Should be a fairly solid 10.0 tank, that Id quite happily use as a back-up in a 10.3 line-up
1 Like
Too good
It already does well at 9.7 with its current round (~DM23 equiv)
not irl? L23A1 didn’t come in until after CR1. Historical rounds are just the L15 APDS (and a bunch of stuff like HEAT we don’t know stats for)
Just nothing at 9.7 though. Either uptiering 9.0/9.3s to use alongside it (let alone more than a few 8.3s, like the Milan Warrior) or just using it at 10.0 anyway.
The 9.3s aren’t bad tho even at 9.7
I thought it did. I recall seeing something along the lines of L23 never existing or something and it should have L23A1 instead.
The turret is actually more armored and can tank Italian low velocity 47mm APHE rounds from hull down positions or German 37mm APHE and 20mm APCR.
1 Like
chieftains were using that shell before chally entered service. its an early 1980s dart
That’s the Chieftain Mk.10
ITPSV leopard 8.7 → 9.0
Why the heck is H-34 going up after all these years? It has nothing going for it besides range, if it goes up against higher BR AAs it’s basically useless
No one is talking about France and I hope the DEVs think about it a little
1- There is no reason for the AMX-M4 to be 7.0, it has a very long reload time, continuing at 6.7 is already ideal
2- The Char 25T should have its BR changed from 8.0 to 7.7
3- If they are going to increase the BR of the AMX-M4, they should go down from the Lorraine 40T 7.7 for 7.3 because you very weak armor
2 Likes
Mbt T-72B 10.3 → 10.0
Air RB: Kurnass 2000 (12.3->12.0)
It only has IR missiles without IRCCM…It should have a lower BR than F16a
4 Likes
Its fine, it has better armor than the TURMS after all