I get that, but its either bullying 8.7s, or getting slightly bullied by 10.0+.
Its only problem imo at 10.0 would be the dart
no bro wtf
How much angle pen does it have at 60 degrees?
I mean a gen 1 thermal would be nice
1 Like
Same shell used on the challenger mk2 and I do okay with it
L23 for side by side comaprison
1 Like
Mode: Ground Realistic Battle
Tank: Chinese M60A3 TTS
Change: 9.0 → 8.7
Reasoning: the chinese M60A3 despite the lack of blazer ERA and the worst apfsds shell is sharing the same br as it’s american counterpart which make absolutly no sense. I propose to lower it’s br down to 8.7 with will greatly help it as it will not face 10.0 tanks anymore and will give it a more viable line up composed of the 8.7 and 8.3 chinese spaa and mediums
5 Likes
Another spaa PGZ09 8.3 → 8.7
Seems reasonable I guess.
It would just be the Chally Mk.2 without thermals at a slightly lower BR.
hells frozen over this guy doesnt want a British vehicle nerfed into ultimate irrelevancy
4 Likes
if i recall the ARH SAM-1C is in the files, though i dunno why gaijin isnt adding
1 Like
Already planned
Idk I think I’d like it at 9.7 with L23
Oh lol
Sidam 25 mistral 9.7 → 9.3
Basically, also I find the dozer blade actually quite handy for the Mk2
When combined with this:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/m22cZZxaNPXJ
Should be a fairly solid 10.0 tank, that Id quite happily use as a back-up in a 10.3 line-up
1 Like
Too good
It already does well at 9.7 with its current round (~DM23 equiv)
not irl? L23A1 didn’t come in until after CR1. Historical rounds are just the L15 APDS (and a bunch of stuff like HEAT we don’t know stats for)
Just nothing at 9.7 though. Either uptiering 9.0/9.3s to use alongside it (let alone more than a few 8.3s, like the Milan Warrior) or just using it at 10.0 anyway.
The 9.3s aren’t bad tho even at 9.7
I thought it did. I recall seeing something along the lines of L23 never existing or something and it should have L23A1 instead.