TXK has better gunsight and better armor
It moves just fine lmao. yes, it will not be the quickest, but it’s already left in the dust at 9.0
Well firstly, the M60A1 Rise p gets ERA packages witch is reallly rare at that br, gives it very good protection against heat and atgms witch are really common at 8.7, the round its not an issue since it spalls well and has a good amount of pen, mobility wise, its mediocre like the t55. Leo a1a1 trades its armour for mobility, firepower is very good like the t55, also gets a rangefinder witch is enough. I dont know much about the chieftain MK5 but it has 120mm 7.5kg apds shell that slaps, most apfsds shells are about 3.5kg, its mobility its slightly worse than t55s and armour wise is mediocre, wierd angled armour saves you most of the times. type 74s are almost the same as leoa1a1s, almost better, 400mm pen apfsds with lrf and great mobility. t55s are amongst them, i dont see a reason for them to go up in br.
No its not. Its literally my experience from ONLY EVER playing naval for the BP.
Again depends on if R73 ever stops over correcting and spinning out which means it fails to be a replacement for 9P which as it stands would be worse. If it exists and has images and documents that they did indeed use it then it could be added but i wouldn’t be suprised if it went up in BR. Not that it will effect me and what i fight by a big amount. I prefer longer range IR missiles and my experience sith R73 is not a good medium range missile.
I really am unsure that Q-5A/L need to be 10.0 in ARB when A-5C with superior RWR and R-550 Magic 1 exist in 10.7
I smell ‘insane repair cost of regular Su-25 for selling Su-25K’ conspiracy here.
Ki-44-II Otsu is a special interceptor version. If you want Ki-44-II with 2 x 7.7mm and 2 x 12.7mm then Ki-44-II Ko has to be in the game.
we in the high tier want decompression, since you don’t play it why do you even oppose it?
1 Like
Air realistic, all applicable tech trees.
F-15A/J
13.0 - 13.3
Reason:
Firing AIM-9Ms, this vehicle is inherently more powerful than the other vehicles of 13.0.
Examples: F-14B uses AIM-9Ls.
F-14A IRIAF is a significantly worse airframe exclusively carried by its F-90s.
JA37Di, a subpar airframe using an ancient RWR, having 2 Swedish 9Ls as backup to the missile that carries it: RB99 also known as AIM-120.
Sea Harrier FA2, a subsonic airframe that has to choose between more countermeasures with 4 9Ms and 2 AIM-120s, or 4 AIM-120s and purely BVR… as a subsonic aircraft.
1 Like
Literally did not oppose it, just pointed out that your reasoning is at best flawd and at worst outright based on false information.
Air realistic, Soviets.
Su-33
13.0 - 13.3
Reason:
Firing R-73s, this vehicle is inherently more powerful than the other vehicles of 13.0.
Examples: F-14B uses AIM-9Ls.
F-14A IRIAF is a significantly worse airframe exclusively carried by its F-90s.
JA37Di, a subpar airframe using an ancient RWR, having 2 Swedish 9Ls as backup to the missile that carries it: RB99 also known as AIM-120.
Sea Harrier FA2, a subsonic airframe that has to choose between more countermeasures with 4 9Ms and 2 AIM-120s, or 4 AIM-120s and purely BVR… as a subsonic aircraft.
1 Like
interesting, no idea what’s going on but just be against it.
Merkava 2D 9.7 → 10.0 (Realistic Battles) + Addition of M428 SWORD
DM33 at 10.0 for a vehicle as fragile, lacking gun handling, having a slower reload rate and worse optics (and thermals) than most other vehicles at 10.0 is completely unreasonable. M428 SWORD will help balance out the Merkava 2D at its new BR so it doesn’t become a peashooter yet again.
4 Likes
Why? The thing still can’t see night battles so what good is Night Vision?
Eh… It’s more of on par with the Tomcat B in terms of being the worst at 13.0. Sure, everything here:
is true, but it’s also got some really good upsides that make these downsides not as bad. I think comparing these 2 from the perspective of how you would play an F-14 doesn’t work. For example, the Viggen is one of the fastest planes on the deck in terms of acceleration (even without afterburner). It has tons of CMs to go with that. It’s supposed to be played like a 1 and done brawler. Go fast, stay low, easily survive, and take out enemies quickly. It easily does well in that role.
Again, I literally have not said that i oppose it. I actually support it.
But it is not realistic. So maybe learn to read properly
Dupleix (French Bluewater Fleet)
Mode : Naval Realistic
BR Change : 5.7 > 5.3
Reasoning: Her penetration is the lowest(1km 149mm/10km 81mm) among all heavy cruisers, and her armor is very thin(60mm). It has no merits compared to other heavy cruisers of the same BR(BR 5.7 heavy cruisers average penetration : 1km 360-420mm/10km 150-240mm), also she can’t fight any cruiser of the same BR. Because she don’t have good penetration, and she isn’t tanky
And her sister ship Colbert is BR 5.3, and the difference in armor between the two ships is only 10mm (Colbert 50mm / Dupleix 60mm)
Dupleix is barely different from her sister ship Colbert and is vastly inferior to the other BR 5.7 cruisers, so her BR 5.7 is not reasonable
10 Likes
We need to seperate vehicles with APFSDS and laser rangefinder from vehicles that don’t have it. Especially 7.7 cannot play with 8.7 BR right now. It’s without any sense. But it’s good for the beginning.
I don’t even know if Iran knows the specs of it. There’s nothing online about it and they haven’t talked about it’s existence yet.
the OTOMATIC still need be 10.7
2 Likes