L-62 needs to remain at 2.7 as there are no other swedish vehicles that fill that gap in rank.
The AMX is a much better platform for Air RB than planes like the A-10. It is actually somewhat responsive and manoeuvrable at the right speed ranges. Of course, it it still nothing to write home about in the flight performance department, but it certainly is a LOT better than the average attacker at this BR.
The Q-5A, for a start, doesnt have MGs, it has the 23-3K cannon found on the A-5C, it is certainly subpar, but its good enough. The Q-5A is practically untouchable to any plane at 9.0 since not only is it very fast, it also has extremely good acceleration and energy retention. It is just a difficult platform to get kills with since it doesnt have a lot of nose authority or AoA.
And the Q-5A actually CAN compete with 10.0 all aspect missiles, not only is it able to hold its speed enough to deny a launch opportunity, it actually has flares. It has practically the same ability to defend itself as the 10.0 A-5C does, and that thing is pretty good at not getting shot down.
4 Likes
Completely agree
Oh really,? And what is OP about it ? The fact that you cant aim?
Bro I have better stats in it than you, and I suck with it. Swedish IFV’s and the BMP 2M as all better and none of you are crying about those
My Suggestion (for RB)
Leopard 2A4(All) (10.3>10.7)
Add DM33 to it and move it to 10.7
Tornado WTD61 and MFG (11.0>10.7)
Move it down to 10.7, they dont have a Business against F-16s, also no Guided weapons except the Kormoran which works only against ships and also cant even hit ships…
BO 105 (German TT) (9.3>9.7)
Currently they share the same BR and are to 99% the same, maybe add better ATGMS to the later one and move it to 9.7 (or add the HOT-3 to it, and move it to 10.0 since 10.0 is a dead heli BR except the Mi-24 at 9.7)
F-4F Late (10.7)
Add Aim-9L and/or AGM-65D/G to it.
7 Likes
that and destroying bases do not take that much RP off
Plus the increase in base respawn from 1(?) to 5(?) minuites has just killed the buccaneer in RB, old playstyle was fly off to the side and come back for the 2nd respawn where people are fighting or RTBing, now by the time the bases respawn your team is dead or the “fighters” on your team have come back with bombs/rockets to destroy the base
LOWER THE BASE RESPAWN TIME GAIJIN
Those KVs casually can rock a solid 5:1+ KD and would now be the same BR as those up tiered T-34s. Are you really thinking a KV-1 is in all aspects equivalent to a T-34 with no advantages over it?
Especially the up armored variants can single handedly take over games and descide them by themselves.
There is no personal preference, just observation when driving them and facing them.
Them being a heavy thank has nothing to do with it in WT and you play long enough to know that. Otherwise, a lot of heavy tanks wouldn’t be at BRs where their Armor is just useless. I could make the same arguments you just brought up to justify the Tiger 1s to go to 5.0.
The M51s have a great gun but lack a stabilizer, they are basically TDs compared to 76mm Shermans. You know what also has a great gun? The M36 with a ton of pen, better post pen effect and sits comfortably on 5.3 or 5.7 for the heat variant.
The penetration of a round doesn’t matter if it has little post pen effect, even if it sports a post war gun and would face ww2 vehicles, see Pbv 501, PT-76 (which also has a stabilizer) or the german leKPz M41.
2 Likes
In RB:
AEC II to 3.7 - same if not better (better in higher tiers) than the Puma.
This vehicle should always be the same as Puma, at the least. Only reason is missed is due to rarity I presume.
Wyvern to 4.7 at least.
2 Likes
No. No no and no.
teh P-51H, F.24 and the Ta 152 C i agree with, though the Ta is a very potent energy fighter, the P-51H was much stronger than anythign else at 6.3 and the F.24 was alright but totally outclassed at 7.0, with fighting the P-51H needing to be as cautious as if its your BR rather than nearly a whole BR below
The La-9 seems fine at its BR, ive never layed it but i see a lot of them (good indicator that its a decent aircraft) the La-11 is worse but there are so few of them gaijin likely doesnt have hte volume of data to propose a change (only being a USSR Event or a chinese tech tree)
and i cannot speak on the Re.2005 (don’t even have a single rank 2 italian aircraft lol) but a whole 1.0 drop is extreme, almost unheard of a change that drastic probabally will break the BR bracket it will then be placed in
and the Meteor Mk.8 is heads and shoulders stronger than the Vampire FB.5, in every caragory apart from a one circle fight
move them down to 10.7, move the rest to 11.0
So the F-104s at 10.3 without flares (not in USA) but the 9.3 F-104s are fine.
As someone who has played the 10.3 F104s and got 3-1 KDR (i am quite good but they are fine at 10.3), the F-104A/C could go to 9.7 or 10.0 and be fine.
At 9.3 they ruin 8.3 and 8.7 games as all planes in those BRs cant catch them.
4 Likes
I think that most tank of Italian Rank 1 are overtiered. The T-26, M2A4, M8 Lac and Tetrarch are reserves with better mobility and guns.
The AMD(SA35) should be 1.0 without the coax mg. I hate having to snipe spaa crew with so little ammo.
its probabally that noone can aim its guns, i i also think its general performance is superior to the same BR sabres, better acceleration (feels like it when fighting) tighter turn, when the guns hti they almost always kill,
The MiG-15 is an amasing plane, probabally just people not learning to get used to its admitedly hard to aim cannons, or its extreme compression in roll and rudder at high speed, learn to work around those disadvantages and you can take on anything at your own BR easily
1 Like
yeah no, the T-26s mobility its probabally the worst of any reserve, and its armour is probabally worse than the AB-41, the only thing the T-26 has over the italian reserves is the cannon (The Stock API-T / HEFI-T* belt is painful, but the HVAP belt seems like it has more promise but i do not have it)
2 Likes
Can we expect SC2500 for other German bombers?
He 111 H-16 isn’t really greatest platform and many better bombers could carry, some even 2 of them (ju-288c)
Nah it’ll be fine. I use T-34’s at 4.0 and 4.7 all the time, and that was before jumbos and tigers BR increase. Now that they are higher up they have less to worry about.
Most vehicles will anyways, T-34’s just won’t be any different. Oh and BTW the VK has terrible turret traverse so you can just run around it to it’s sides and demolish it. :)
I personally don’t have the same opinion. I think lots of the WW2 tanks and aircraft do fine were there at. The only times that I feel like it punishes my WW2 vehicles is at like 6.3-6.7. But that’s only because you have to enter the cold war era vehicles at some point.
Your right, you can have fun at 4.0, you just actually have to think about how to play your tanks (in this case the T-34) a little bit more. And I promise if you just think before rushing in you will do just fine. As for them being rank 2, I don’t agree with that. I’d love to see the 1942 and STZ ones moved up to tank 3, but I don’t see that happening for awhile :(
1 Like
I personally like the T-26, It’s one of my most played tanks, but I understand what you mean by it being bad. It’s quite slow and has no survivability.
The Italian reserves are actually the best tanks they have at rank 1.
They are just the german flakpanzer at 1.0.
1 Like