Once more the naval changes are absolutely pitiful as expected by the devs…
All things are regarded to realistic battles.
• If you’re gonna put the Peacock class Corvettes to 4.0 at least give them more shells then a minutes worth of ammunition.
• Which Albatros is going up? The Type 143 FAC or the Albatros class Corvette?
• I don’t agree with the K class sloop going to 4.3, the thing is slow an the guns are inadequate above such a BR.
• Okay It’s probably my fault for the No.13 subchaser going to 2.0 but I don’t see how that can work when it’s so lightly armed even compared to the ahistorical Type 5 at 1.7.
• The Minensuchboot M-1935 M-17 should stay its current BR.
• The Gabbiano class Corvette Folago should also stay its BR, no point increasing it.
• At least the Königsberg class cruiser Köln going to 5.3 makes some sense but where’s Karlsruhe?
Suggestions:
• Serious question but how in the world isn’t the Project 204 Going to 4.0?? for it’s a menace at 3.7.
I ponder when the BR changes happened after its addition an saw the Restigouche class destroyer get sent to 4.0 even through back then it was ehh but to see this corvette remain at 3.7 is ridiculous.
• Project 35 4.3 to 4.7 or at most 5.0
With how easy it’s to get the SKR-7 & how ridiculously OP it still is the vessel should have its BR increased significantly.
• Project 159 from 4.3 to 4.7
Like the SKR-7 the SKR-1 is also OP but being EoL TT it should be increased but not as much.
• Project 50
SKR Rosomacha 4.0 to 3.7
SKR Karl Marx 4.0 to 3.7
SKR Yenot 4.0 to 3.3
These ships have remained at 4.0 for a rather long time an are basically over BR’ed, the first two get rocket assisted depth charge so they should have a lesser BR but the third is rather horrible for 4.0 only has two torpedoes & hedgehogs, This vessel should at least be 3.3 imo.
• Tacoma class Frigate USS Hoquiam PF-5 3.3 to 3.0,
Once more I beg that this stupid sad & useless ship get a BR reduction for it cannot defend itself from forward or reward engagements & has one horrible damage model especially now, It probably wouldn’t be to OP since it struggles against most similar size & smaller ships.
• Porter class destroyer USS Phelps DD-360 5.0 to 4.7.
It’s a pre WWII ship stripped down to a lighter armament akin to a Fletcher class yet still stuck at 5.0 even even similar armed ships are at 4.0.
• Impetuous class destroyer 4.0 to 4.3 basically as just mentioned it’s quite armed for 4.0 & it’s a surprise it’s still here.
• Ayanami class Destroyer JDS Ayanami DD-103, 4.0 to 4.3 only on the condition it’s rerated as a destroyer like it’s historically so AI AA doesn’t melt it due to its frigate damage model.
• Chidori class Torpedo Boat 3.7 to 3.3, It’s ridiculous to think that this is still 3.7 when similar ships to its design time are 3.3, the vessel should be at that BR imho.
Aircraft,
• A-7K 11.0 to 10.7 or 10.3
This Aircraft is quite sad & extremely horrible to play it should’ve been lowered ages ago yet here we’re.
• Q-5L, 9.7 to 9.3,
Ahistorically gimped an is only at 9.7 due to GBU’s but it could easily be at 9.3 given Aircraft around it, OR you it all the historical bells & whistles an make it 10.0 or 10.3.
• US F-5A/C 10.3 to 10.7
These Aircraft are incredible for their current BR an should be higher up in BR over what they currently are even if with Ahistorical countermeasures.
• V-12 2.3 to 2.0 or 1.7
I don’t get this aircraft it’s rather sad compared to it’s predecessor but it shouldn’t be it’s current BR especially when more heavily armed Aircraft are below it’s BR.
• Fw 189 A-1 2.3 to 2.0 or lower
Same as above inadequate armament for BR especially in the bomb department an it doesn’t take damage well at all ntm for it’s BR it’s terribly slow.
• A-36 2.7 to 3.0
How in the world is an early mustang at 2.7 especially with the ability to carry twn 12.7 mm HMG’s which will destroy basically all underpowered Aircraft around its BR.
• P-51A 3.0 to 2.7
Also an early Mustang but somehow it’s a higher BR must runway spawn & has a lower armament, how are these two BR’s a thing.
• D4Y2 2.3 to 2.0 or lower
This thing doesn’t make sense especially since it’s a bomber that must research bombs to be a bomber so it suffers a bit just before it becomes a bomber, It could definitely work at 2.0 or at least give it the 60kg bombs stock please.
• F-104 A models & C model 9.3 to 9.7
I was happy when it went down originally from 10.0 but the decision to make it 9.3 was ABSOLUTELY STUPID, Put it back up & maybe give them their other historical armament or those in the CDK.
• F-104G Italy 10.7 to 10.3 it’s a balanced aircraft but it’s current BR is daft tbh.
• F-104S /TAF 11.0 to 10.7
They were originally this BR & okay but the decision to make them 11.0 was dumb imo, they should return.
• F-104S.ASA 11.3 to - 11.0
It’s quite sad an it fights 12.3 fouth gen aircraft, this thing should be lowered plus four AIM-9L’s is meh nowadays ntm this things RWR sucks in game.
• MiG-21SPS-K 9.7 to 10.0
I don’t get how this went down as it was perfect at 10.0 ntm R-13M1 missiles at 9.7 is ridiculous imo (R-60’s are overrated imo).
• MiG-21S 9.7 - 10.0
If it became the MiG-21SM an had R-13M1 missiles & the SPS-141 countermeasure pod added (besides Red 23 was a MiG-21SM, So why is it on a MiG-21S airframe??, NTM the old forum had a thread discussing this aircraft).
• MiG-21PFM 9.3 to 9.7
If given the ability to swap out armament into the export fighter variant as a mod & gained the ability to launch R-60 AAM’s, This is kinda like some soviet tank mods currently take the T-64B/ BV mod kit iirc.
Yep that wraps up my thoughts but like always I doubt anything will happen especially for the naval side…
