For the love of jod, please dont move the mig15s/sabres down in br, move the f104, up instead
15 Likes
It’s good to move these 9.3 - 8.3 subsonic fighters down, but you forgot the Shenyang F-5.
CL-13B Mk.6 (Germany) gets from 9.3 to 9.0, Shenyang F-5 should also get, both are subsonic fighters with afterburner and AIM-9B
2 Likes
I wish… my baby the Hunter F.1 still faces All Aspects and uh… it dies. I cry and sob.
Funny old thing it didn’t get included in the changes that I can see
I get the Vulcan is an exceptional gun, but I know i’d much rather take something with flares, better missiles, very nice dogfight characteristics (I suppose you could say the T-2 with its high alpha is good in that sense… but uh yeah you do you)
The range is sufficiently bad I’d rather take 9Bs.
Exactly. Right now the Fox only has a lineup with the Conway (pain) and the Demolition Vehicle (AVRE, pray for a urban map)
3 Likes
it is, and has been ‘aknowledged’ for a while
1 Like
6.0 hellcats? this a joke or something? or are you just intent on ruining every good lineup the US has?
also, t-34 1941 at 4.0? you’re putting the tank with 45mm of frontal turret armor higher than the panzer 4 h because people dont know how to aim for turrets?
also, f-15 still 12.3 kekw
9 Likes
OTOMATIC to 10.3 with stock APFSDS, no missiles but in terms of Br its on par with the FlaRakRad, Pantsir, ADATS, Tor-M1, ItO 90M , and better than the 2S6(heavily under tiered), Type 81 (C), XM975, Lav-AD, FlaRakPz 1, and Gepard 1A2. It is nor on par or better than any of these.
5 Likes
The issue with the 2S38 is not taking kill, the issue is it lol-pens most of the armour where it is more than 300mm thick RHA, I died couple of times with my abrams from the middle of the turret cheeks. And it is somehow Overpressure proof, 155mm HE shell on its turrets, or side does nothing most of the time.
I dont think it should share the same BR with the Puma, half the penetration, with no HE-VT shell, just a bit more armour, which is not quite helpful against soviet MBTs.
Either 2S38 should go up and meet with the HSTVL, could be 11.0, or some kind of decompression needed to be done.
2 Likes
id call it a sidegrade, fired in range and not in a diving aspect while supersonic the Red top is practically undodgable, the AIM-9B is more a minecraft arrow with a proximity fuze anyone with any airspeed can dodge it easily
Why USS Atlanta still 5.3 RB?
And why SMS Elbing still 4.7 RB?
3 Likes
(RB) MiG-29 (9-13): 12.0 → 12.3 (give it R-73s, remove its R-27ERs)
The plane is very much dragged down by its extremely subpar IR missiles. The MiG-29 (9-13) could really use R-73s to become the SMT’s WVR-focused sidegrade, with worse avionics and no long-range missiles but better flight performance (and, soon, no R-77s, which would completely justify its lower BR).
1 Like
HSTVL is vastly superior to the Strf 9040C and 2S38.
2S38 should be 10.3, as it’s an Strf 9040C with more pen.
HSTVL is vastly superior to both though.
2 Likes
super hellcat +0.3. wtf, it’s not 60 hp that makes it op, it makes it playable.
m18 “black cat” +0.3. why since it doesn’t get the engine upgrade?!
zsu-37 -0.3. Remove it’s apcr!
btr152D +0.3. why?
bmp1 +0.3. Where is the atgm view for the konkurs?
amx30 dca +0.3. F off, there’s no way the itpsv (yeet it at 9.3, it’s op) isn’t better than it!
roland 1 -0.3. which one, the french or the german?
mirage IIIC -0.3. FINALLY!!!
Q5a +0.3. Why, because flares? Now it can face 10.3 without missiles and planes it can’t catch up…
mig 17 -0.3. NO NO NO NO NO!!! (lol 7.7 are gonna cry) Does that also includes the mig17AS?
ajs37 -0.3, yay a 10.7 viggen, good luck killing that in downtiers…
18 Likes
But it has worse mobility and literally no gun depression at all. I would not call it a complete upgrade over the bulldog I’d say it’s just a side grade. It’s very good but it also has some big downsides
Well they should model the seperate APFSDS drum before doing so.
And the just open up infinite APFSDS storage once thats done and put it at 10.3-10.7
2 Likes
Rarely is these days
Source?!!!?!!??
Just nerf the reload on the T-34 1941 instead of moving it up.
It’s silly that it reload in 6.9s in the most cramped two-man turret in existence, while a Pz IV in a much more spacious three-man turret reloads in 5.9s.
The T-34 1942 has better RoF and a better armored turret, so it makes no sense to again put them on the same BR.
Just nerf the reload rate, it’s historical and “reload rate is based on vehicle balance” remember?
3 Likes
Also, if you are going to move down planes in br move down the G91Y, the hunter F1 and the Mysteries/sambad they struggle a lot in 9.0
8 Likes
2s38 is also the best spaa at it’s br, it has literally everything and should be 11.0 at the very least. And basically same goes for the UD and the turms, that are just better vehicles than what is in the tree at the same br range. It’s premium bias, nothing else.
3 Likes
I could give you the replay if I can find them, both battles were like 1-2 months ago. if I find them, then, I need to be sure the replays are compatible with the current version.
I’ll look it for a bit. let you know when I find, one should be I ate the apfsds right in the middle of the leopard 2A5’s turret RHAs.
1 Like