Well, the BB-1s BR is too low for both air and ground battles.
It’s just way too good for 1.3 compared to any other aircraft of its type.
1 Like
AGS need m900 and maybe go to 11.3
shenyang f-5 need to go 9.0
2s38 and obj292 both go to 10.3
G91Y go to 8.7
G91YS go to 9.0
this two plane can’t even supersonic why they have so much high BR
And why AMX go to 10.7? any reason? cuz GBU?
so you want a subsonic plane against f-14 or other gen 3 plane ?
GAIJIN that’s why Italy has only 1% player to play
GUESS NO ONE CARES ABOUT ITALY
1 Like
its on par, most trees have a strong attacker at that br
Umm I may be wrong, but I’m pretty sure that the only difference between the prem and TT versions of regular m18 is the muzzle break, which is mostly cosmetic…
and the later ones have 460HP rather than 400 on teh Black cat, this was a buff in the last week though
The Vampire Yes, the venom was suprisingly enjoyable, main problem is the Hispanos being lacking at that BR
This would be a very positive change, we can avoid players who only go for the most broken vehicles and dilute the skill levels of top tier AMI players with their ass F104S grind.
Huh, okay. I didn’t realize this happened
as someone who played the hellcat religiously back in the day the prem one and the normal m18 are identical bar a few cosmetic changes , and of course that premium bonus
Oh yeah? On par with what? With a Stuka that flies like a boat? Or a Japanese plane that carries 250-500kg bombs instead of 1200kg?
1 Like
so theres the Ju-87R-2, SB2U-2, SB2U-3, V156, Wirraway, B5N2, D3A1, V-11, Ba…65, B17B
None of these are better than the BB-1
Hell the Su-2s are are equivalent and at from 1.7-2.7, with the MV-5 being the most similar
2 Likes
Sb2u, tbf-1c, ju-87 r2, v-156, wirraway, b6n1, v-11, hawk III, ba.65, b-17
all are very solid ground attackers and some are better than the bb-1
yeah no
Only the TBF has a chance with the 50 cals and the 2000lb, or the SB2U-3, both of which are 1.7 and at best sidegrades to BB-1
2 Likes
basically all the things listed are a side grade, because they are the nations equivilents, the su-2s just dont move in br due to the fact no one plays them, a common curse for foldered vehicles and their balancing methods at gaijin that use the algorithm.
in terms of payload/ armament/ speed the v-156 is better in every way except speed, so no i can confidently say there is nothing special about the bb-1 coming from someone who has played all the low level attackers that i just listed, in truth they are mostly samey and blend into one with the exception of the stuka and the b6n, one for its fat bomb and the ability to out turn everything if you know a few tricks, and the other because it flies like a fighter
It would indeed. It’s why I’m a tad on the fence about Harrier Gr1 and Hunter F6 balance. Because the difference between what they are like Vs what they should be like is so huge
1 Like
they are nowhere near all sidegrades, they are all inferior, none fo them have a millimetre accurate bombsight attached to 2 500kg bombs, and the fact its not too bad at manoeveing and not that slow for 1.3, with an excellent turret gunner
1 Like
The Leo 40/70 has essentially zero armor for most of the crew, what do you mean?
Poor Italy , the only good line up now is gone
Now they need to use G91YS to CAS and this thing don’t even has RWR and any countermeasure
Now I know why only 1% player plays Italy
Me with my spitfire will be fighting Mig-15’s? I hope not. Just put my spitfire at 6.7’s.
2 Likes
①
The R2Y2 is noticeably slower and less durable than other jets. Its BR in RB needs to be lowered from 8.0 to 7.7 or 7.3.
②
The Ki-200’s BR is too high at RB. It’s very strange that a WWII aircraft is being tracked by post-war missiles. Also, the Ho-155 II update has made its ammo belts less powerful, so more rounds are needed to kill an enemy than before. It needs to be decreased from the current BR 8.7 to BR 8.3.
③
The Ki-84hei’s cannon has been weakened, just like the Ki-200, so it should be lowered from BR 6.3 to BR 6.0 in RB. Also, the BR of this aircraft is 7.7 in AB, which is obviously higher than other countries’ single-engine reciprocating aircraft. The BR in AB should also be lowered from 7.7 to 7.3 or 7.0.
④
The Type87RCV and Type87RCV(P) have unreasonably high BR settings.
In particular, the Type87RCV is at BR9.0 even though it does not have a heat source detection device or sufficient armor. It is clearly inferior to armored combat vehicles of other countries. It should be lowered to BR8.3.
The Type87RCV(P) is set to BR7.7 even though its main armament is the same as that of an anti-aircraft vehicle with a BR5.3. Also, since there are no other Japanese vehicles at BR7.7, the options for using it are narrowed, so it should be lowered to BR7.3 or BR6.7.
⑤
The J7W1 has poor climbing ability, poor turning ability, and inferior cannon ammo capacity compared to other nations’ interceptors in the same BR range. I think the BR should be lowered from 6.0 to 5.7 or 5.3, or the BR should be kept the same and the match should start in the air. Spawning in the air would make sense, especially since the plane was developed to intercept bombers.
2 Likes