Not fan seeing more compression at down tier. As always decompression need to be on top, and less decompression below, to have fairness between player.
If this compression happen, then i don’t understand why some aircraft which are even less powerful than F86 series/ MiG 15-17 series are forgotten, when they need to be the priority before even talk F86/MiG-15/17. At least the compression would be more “understable”.
MD.454A (Mystere IVa) - to 8.3 or 8.0 in air RB and Air SB - Currently One of the worst 8.7 in air rb/air SB, people asked way before this planned changed to be either 8.3 or 8.0. Because the performance this aircraft was not equal to 8.7 in first place. 8.0 seems to be the way as this aircraft be more in line with other 8.0 aircraft performance. No way this plane be in a fair match-up against F86F series, CL-13, MiG-17 and MiG-15 Bis
MD.452C (Mystere IIC) - to 8.0 in air RB and SB. This aircraft do not have the performance to deal with F86F series (2/25/30/35). the F86F is a league better than a MD.452C. The 452C is essentially a 452A with 30mm weaponnary. as 452A is already at 8.0 452C should be at the same BR
Vautour IIA/IIB - To 8.3 in air RB and SB. Players have as always asked for this change since years. IIN is already at 8.3 and have Missile. While IIA have no missile, Gun and ground armement only, and IIB only ground armement, need an explanation for this. Why these 2 planes keep to be forgotten in every planned battle rating change. While an LA-200 sit for now years at 7.7. It’s just make no sense
F84F - To 8.0 in air RB. Good luck with this one, if the current planned BR change is apply. Facing F86F series at the same BR? Good luck
Venom - 8.3 in air RB, 8.7 in air SB. No one used this aircraft anymore, and for good reason. This place should be a priority to receive a BR chance. Venom same BR as Lim-5, MiG-17? when these are a league better than the Venom?
Hunter F-1 - 8.7 in air RB. This is one of the old which need to be a priority change. How a lim-5 Cl.13 can go at 8.7 and still forget for Hunter F-1 which can only count on its speed.
Last note: I still advocate for a reduction of the BR spread of the match. From 1.0 to 0.7. Will help greatly the balance of the game. If Gaijin go to compression BR, the need of a new BR spread will be.
Decompression more, compression less. For the balance of the game.
This line of thinking is like saying Jumbo and Easy Eight cant share the same BR because Easy Eight has better gun and mobility.
They very much can share the same, because Id use Easy Eight and Jumbo on different maps for different scenarios.
Same with A1A1/Chieftain Mk.5.
maybe from people that are still making their way to top tier, but I can assure you, no one will put A1A1 in 9.3/9.7 lineup when there are much better picks, and no one will uptier 8.7 tanks to 9.0 just to play a tank that should be 8.7 to begin with.
Only Marginally, Their both shermans at the end of the day its like saying the Valentine XI and the Matilda should be different BRs becuase one has a better gun and marginally better mobility, where one has marginally Much more of a difference than the Leo 1 and Cheiftain, there are very few senarios where a A1A1 isnt better than the Cheiftain Mk.5
Not the tanks fault, i play british 3.7 and find it fun, but i do not bring the Churchill I and the Cromwell V due to said better picks
Yeha, no many tanks can be uptiered in lineups easily, especcially mobile ones with a good enough gun, not the best example but i uptier the Vickers Mk.11 to 9.3 all the time and it does fine, and a more direct comparison, the Cheiftain Mk.10, I uptier it to 9.3, its shit but is that suprising if its probabally more balanced at 8.7? not to mention the Leo 1 which is leagues more mobile thanthe cheiftain deals with uptiers better
the issue is, does this marginal increase in capability between mk5 and A1A1 warrant 0.3 BR increase?
TAM is much better medium/light tank tahn both A1A1 and mk5, yet it sits below A1A1. If TAM and A1A1 switched places, it would be much more desirable placement, alas.
still needs to be taken into account when balancing a vehicle.
There is no proper argument the 2S38 hysteria partakers can bring up that warrants this vehicle being moved up. I wonder why players like you ignore the Swedish IFVs having HE-VT, radar and APFSDS with better armor at 10.0.
Literally, bandwagoning cause you got killed.
One good thing about TAM variants is the engine acts as hull armor, unlike Leopards or Chieftains, hitting there almost always guaranteed OHKO, TAM will shoot you back if you hit the hull, even the 130mm APHE from the Object 279 will stuck there, the only way to reliable kill it is the turret cheek, so it overall has better protections/survivability than Leopard 1 variants.
this is where i am speaking from experience, i have spaded more or less every plane that is going to fight these down tiered migs and sabres and i can say with absolute confidence they are going to be fodder, all the sabre or mig has to do if they mess up is run away and come back later, with the exception of maybe the la200 in which case you just turn and let that sky whale list as the two more modern fighters are infinitely more manouverable and retain their energy. Also as someone who has spaded every spitfire, i can also tell you that currently the later griffon spits are horrible to play, as that uptier is just death, now its guaranteed death
Put the BB-1 from 1.3 to 1.7 or even 2.0
It’s way too strong as a Strike Aircraft. It can carry an insane amount of ordanance for 1.3 while also having good flight performance and better firepower than most fighters.
Its not the fact they are ignoring it, its more the fact you dont see those ifvs as nearly as much and they are not nearly as good, i was spading out my chally 1 mk 3 today, and i think i saw one swede ifv which i promptly nailed to the side of the cross, but every game i would see the 2s38 and normally it was more than one.
The two vehicles are not really comparable though, as the 2s38 is significantly more survivable, that front fuel tank sometimes eats shells and there is nothing in the turret, unlike the 90s. The 2s38 also has aphe with 151mm of pen on the flat on a 57mm gun, along with better penning APFSDS than any of the 90s, the only 90 with a good apfsds shell has 170/143/93mm of pen on the flat at point blank, to the 225/190/130mm of the 2s38, which is the difference of front plating and turret ringing alot of people, as i cant get front penned by the swedes, of which only on has the good shell, where as the 2s38 can do it easily.
What you have listed there is two different vehicles each having their own strength, one has radar but the weak dart round, the other has the good dart round and no radar. They all have a fuse shell, but that is standard fair for any ifv with a 40mm or larger gun.
Something you would know if you had ever actually played any of them
I think the issue with that is us waiting for the seperation of air and ground br’s for planes, as there are alot of really strong revenge bombers that are all now hovering at br 2.7 or below XD
AGS need m900 and maybe go to 11.3
shenyang f-5 need to go 9.0
2s38 and obj292 both go to 10.3
G91Y go to 8.7
G91YS go to 9.0
this two plane can’t even supersonic why they have so much high BR
And why AMX go to 10.7? any reason? cuz GBU?
so you want a subsonic plane against f-14 or other gen 3 plane ?
GAIJIN that’s why Italy has only 1% player to play
GUESS NO ONE CARES ABOUT ITALY
Umm I may be wrong, but I’m pretty sure that the only difference between the prem and TT versions of regular m18 is the muzzle break, which is mostly cosmetic…
