Ah, thats why the F-4F has a higher BR in SB lul
mid tier 8.0 needs decompression, T-54’s and other heavies are suffering.
Sure buddy I also care about my virtual penis (stats) size.
Its a fact 2S38 should go up. Cope/cry/seethe/mald, dont care didnt ask, russian main.
1 Like
2s38 to 10.7
This needs to be done
2 Likes
Honestly its on par with the hstvl, it could go to 11.3 any day and still preform identically to it is now
Pen values of 2s38 sit in the middle while compared with 9040c and HTSTVL so that’s why I said that it should be 10.7 but if it goes even higher, I won’t have any problems with that
While I get Spitties are absolutely fantastic (I know, incredible British engineering) I do somewhat feel that the MiG-15 will have no real problems printing a metric ass tonne of energy to “counter” the Spit.
2 Likes
unless the mig has no idea what they are doing the spit will lose everytime.
3 Likes
aye the pen is the only short fall, but its more than enough to turret ring, breech and devestate any tank it sees from the side
1 Like
teh sim BRs are fucked anyway, it makes no sense for it to be a higher BR than the FGR, probabally a gaijin moment where they forgot to move it down with other phantoms and never rectified it
The La-200 might be okay… and maybe the airspawn F-84s… but that’s kinda it. I remember when bringing a J29 i’d do a nice climb pattern that’d give me a decent amount of energy… and then some MiG-15 who was a good 5,000ft higher than me would ruin my game by forcing me defensive and force me down… what made it worse was there wasn’t really a counterplay to it. They were faster, so you couldn’t run away. They could retain their energy better, so they’d only ever lose if they tried to take a rolling fight with you… which is risky in itself…
i checked with my german main friend and he said its underwelming at 9.0 but fine, theres many cases where a significant upgrade is 0.3 away (examples being IS-2 and IS-2 (1944), T-44 and T-44-100, FV4202, Centurion Mk.3, Cromwell V and Cromwell I, the Two Crusaders, etc…) its not uncommon, you see a few of them which means that they are not hopeless,
lets put it this way,
Is it going to be an Equivalent to the Chieftain Mk.5?, No Cheiftain Mk.5 has 298mm pen APDS (while the A1A1 has 337mm pen APFSDS which is much more reliable) and, Much less manoeverability, with the only armour improvement being in the turret (for what the guns fo the BR care about) and desite it being a completely differnt vehicle, the Rooikat MTTD has the same round and penetration statistics and i have never noticed an issue with the firepower on the MTTD Except in a FULL uptier facing the russian 10.0
even against a same BR F-84B, of they have 2 braincells they will win every time
1 Like
it was balanced at 4.7 for my experience, 5.3 was dealable, but 6.0 is straight up overkill…
2 Likes
This is absolutely true. They are a menace to reserve destroyers at 3.3 and 3.7.
1 Like
Menace to everything above them too ^^
CRITICISMS:
T-34 (1941, 1st armor battalion, Finland) (3.7-3.7)
all T-34 1941 now overtiered, at least compensate them with Rank III bump-up.
Poor old M4 and Pz. IV long gun users can’t aim for the gaping turret cheeks so the snail handholds them.
M18, M64 (5.7-5.7)
this thing to 6.0, idk what the snail is smoking. Germoney supphers again ig?
Spitfire Mk24 (7.0-7.0)
Spitfire mk.24 now able to fight early sabres and mig-15, hello, april fools was 14 days ago!
Ostwind (3.7-3.7)
it’s not slow firing and does not have a terrible magazine capacity, no reason to move it down to 3.3. Must in fact move up to 4.0, it’s also an objectively better plane killer than the M19A1 at 4.0 given its rate of fire.
SUGGESTED BR CHANGES:
Leopard 2A7V, Strv 122 (all variants), T-80BVM: (11.7-12.0)
move to 12.0 since these things singlehandedly make top tier unjust for all nations, apart from compression issues. Give the BVM 3BM59 (~20-30mm pen > than 3BM60) just to make it more capable with said contenders.
VT-4A1 (11.7-11.3, or buff reload/engine/aim speeds)
objectively underperforming tank compared to its domestic production cousins, the 99A and its prototype. The sluggish mobility tied with noticeably below average gun aim speeds and reload speed makes it unfit for 11.7 aka actual top tier given the nature of its contenders. I think it’s time to consult and consider the numerous reports made about this tank, or if impossible, just move it down to 11.3.
Su-25T, Su-39 (11.3-11.0)
reason: these things are the slowest at their tier and can only carry two R-73s at the most and they don’t even have HMD. Enemies can compensate for the IRCM device in the tail by just gunning this thing down, which is not a hard task given its horrendous speed. If the supersonic Jaguar IS with two Magic IIs is at 11.0, then why not this? This thing can be at 11.3 or even higher but only when equipped with A2G loadouts, which is a revolutionary feature that is sadly not yet implemented.
PRAISES:
Good to see the Sabres and early MiGs going down in BR, about time to distance them from lightning-fast missile hurlers at 9.3 and above, such as A-10/Su-25, mig-19 and early mig-21, etc
Finally, the objectively despised RAT issues such as that of the Fox and Leopard 40-70 are being addressed.
1 Like
How about the G.91’s? why aren’t they being moved, especially all the Italian variants.
man that would make sraams very spicy
its a Bosvark with 360 degree firing, much smaller, and more manoeverable, it deserves to be higher than the Bosvark, especially as the Zu-23 is a menace agaisnt aircraft
1 Like