You mean M2k (Mirage) or Rafale. The EF2k is the Eurofighter lol
2 Likes
GRB will be alot more bearable with strong dogfighters being nerfed.
I wanna know what kind of stuff they’re on.
Like, can I get sum of that too?
but how would u know they fight 6km away thats beyond visual range
1 Like
Vehicle: F-16A Block 10
Gamemode: Air Simulator
BR Change: 12.7 —> 12.3
Reason: The israel F-16 Netz is at 12.3 while featuring a better air 2 air loadout
2 Likes
Removing vehicles is discraceful
3 Likes
I beg of you, rethink the Churchill nerf, this one is too much!
The churchill, a heavy tank, slower than the Maus, with mediocre firepower but with strong armour. This thing on large maps is rubbish. It can be destroyed frontally by plenty of SPHs/SPGs and tank destroyers. It also can be destroyed by plenty of other medium and heavy tanks at it’s own BR. People just either don’t know how to take it out, or they chose not to flank, or engage it at high risk, and lose.
This tank is moving up, and will now face 6.0s in full uptiers. This is inexcuseable. IS-2s, Panthers, SU-100s, and M18s.
This will simply be the antithesis of fun. It struggles enough as it is in full uptiers already, and that’s because of it’s gun being too garbage, at the trade off for armour, and now the armour is even more redundant with the gun being even less effective.
6 Likes
its not that deep
As much as I’d love to see the Churchill VIIs (and Cromwell Vs) staying at their current BRs, them getting APHE doomed them to get a higher BR
People won’t want to give up the APHE, so we’ll have to live with these tanks going up in BR
not talking about that talking about SU33
Japan having access to a completely fictional tank, that never existed in any physical form, apart from drawings.
There was no chassis build, no mild steel prototype, they having it just wasn’t fair for other tech tree, i fully agree with it’s removal. Britain has plenty of vehicles that were fully built and tested, that aren’t in the game, Japan having a tank that never existed simply wasn’t fair.
1 Like
i told them this would happen but no im a german main what do i know XD called it day one second this thing got APHE it would be a beast and get br raised
Rather have a fake tank then copy paste trash
Soon
4 Likes
germany couldnt keep its half built or paper vehicles so neither can japan for example the FLAK 341 which had guns and a hull but no turret other than wood mock up
Both the BMPT and BMPT-72: 11.7 > 12.3
It’s criminal they’re still this low in BR, they literally are able to carry in top tier without breaking a sweat and usually great shots are still not enough to kill it, it’s mind boggling.
1 Like
I knew it as well, but couldn’t post about it at the time.
My complaints wouldn’t have made a difference anyways, but still, pretty annoyed about those changes wrecking two of my line-ups
1 Like
Rather have neither and grind unique stuff faster
If it were up to me id bring then back not my fault they took them aways.
1 Like
T20 has been my most regretted premium tank purchase. I basically don’t play it because it’s at a BR where tech tree tanks have 90 mm guns, so it’s 76 mm with negligible penetration can’t keep up. Seems like I just don’t vibe with the tank, but how it’s at a higher BR than the M41 Walker Bulldog is beyond me
Can we swap the VS-10 and V-990 in the tech tree? V-990 should be tier 4, while VS-10 should be tier 3.
Moving StuG III G and Cromwell V to tier 3? Amazing!
Moving M44 down to tier 2? Pity, but I guess it’s a 1 for 1 trade with StuG II G. M55 is unplayably bad, so it does not matter
Moving all 6.3 and 6.0 BR SPGs down by 0.3? Fun!
IS-2s down to 6.0? Finally!
Tiger II early moving down to 6.3? Questionable, but I’m willing to give it a try.
G6 down to 6.3? That’s something, but it is worse than M109A1, so it shouldn’t be at a higher BR
2 Likes