Planned Battle Rating Changes (August 2026)

Im talking about AB, not RB.

Dont tease them, theres “players” dedicated to the german tech tree that will still find a way to perform worse in a Turm 3 at 3.0 than france players in something comparable.

Also: L3 clearly smoler than Clovis (or random other german premium tank) and better reload, so its obvious why they need to egopush every corner with a tank waiting behind xD

1 Like

Has nothing to do with the mode, the stuff you have listed


says it all ngl

Who dat? Damn thats huge for such a low quality pic.

oh I think we know who alright

Fixed?

1 Like

Is he wrong tho?

Have to play turms like a light vic but doesnt get scouting or lazer RF

Both have 20/ 30mm cannons.

Clovis is faster and takes way more shots due to the engine soaking shells

Turms gets stab, AP (broken) and im stuggling for any more benefits it has over clovis.

After using turm i wish i bought the clovis

mmm I dont think zis is front enuf, more front engine action pls hans

8.3 for RB too

Let me get this straight: you want to make ground battles more fun by removing more fighters from lineups, just so our tanks can be obliterated even better at spawn by the usual bomber and/or attacker? Genius! A change made by true connoisseurs.

5 Likes

why blue tho

they are actually lowering more figter’s brs in ground than increasing.

an IQ too high

1 Like

Even worse, it’s not just fighters, a bunch of strike aircraft are getting their BRs lowered as well

F-111A absolutely needs AIM-9J.

Equivalent attackers in other trees have far superior air-to-air missiles.

Su-22s carry six all aspect R-60M/MKs.

Give the plane its historical loadout of AIM-9Js.

6 Likes

Vehicle: OF-40 Mk.2A
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 9.0 —> 8.7
Reason: If you’re lowering the BR of Leopard A1A1, then OF-40 Mk.2A should also receive a BR reduction.

Or give OF-40 Mk.2A the DM33, just like the Leopard 1A5. If both tanks are going to share the same BR, they should have comparable firepower.

3 Likes

Vehicle: Sholef
BR Change: 7.3 → 7.0
Reason: In its current state, all of its features are weaknesses. The autoloader performs worse than its counterparts: 7.5 seconds for the first 3 rounds and then 20-25 seconds, compared to 7.5 seconds for the 2S19M1 at BR 7.0, and 6 seconds for the 2S19M2 at BR 7.3. Reloading is disabled if EITHER the loader or the autoloader gets damaged. Its “strong” armor is basically useless, as it cannot withstand even the weakest autocannons. It lacks a laser rangefinder as well.
The PzH 2000 at 7.7 feels like a whole BR stronger than this abomination

2 Likes

I love seeing the huge amount of BR reduction suggestions that are results of the planned BR reductions of the Leos

We could protest against the Leo going down in BR and ask for other BRs to be raised, but I guess more BR compression is the better solution somehow

Ah hell nah, not the Sturmelefant