GROUND REALISTIC
R2Y2 V1 8.0 → 7.3
With vehicles like the Canberra bombers moving to 7.3, IL-28s moving to 7.0, and F3D moving to 6.7 (an overall downwards trend for primarily ground attackers at this BR), the R2Y2s should move down as well.
Their ground attack capabilities are nothing special, only having a single bomb without a bombsight, and four cannons which require you to get well within the effective range of the many cold war gun SPAAs that can be found even down at 7.3, let alone at 7.7 or 8.0.
In an uptier R2Y2 can even see M247 and PGZ09, which have airburst tracer-less ammo and good radars, making them imposible to play against.
9 Likes
I meant its made from paper. MB
And it still shoots ghost shells since it had new stab. So bugged and bad
GROUND REALISTIC
R2Y2 V2 8.0 → 7.3
With vehicles like the Canberra bombers moving to 7.3, IL-28s moving to 7.0, and F3D moving to 6.7 (an overall downwards trend for primarily ground attackers at this BR), the R2Y2s should move down as well.
Their ground attack capabilities are nothing special, only having a single bomb without a bombsight, and four cannons which require you to get well within the effective range of the many cold war gun SPAAs that can be found even down at 7.3, let alone at 7.7 or 8.0.
In an uptier R2Y2 can even see M247 and PGZ09, which have airburst tracer-less ammo and good radars, making them imposible to play against.
8 Likes
GROUND REALISTIC
R2Y2 V3 8.0 → 7.3
With vehicles like the Canberra bombers moving to 7.3, IL-28s moving to 7.0, and F3D moving to 6.7 (an overall downwards trend for primarily ground attackers at this BR), the R2Y2s should move down as well.
Their ground attack capabilities are nothing special, only having a single bomb without a bombsight, and four cannons which require you to get well within the effective range of the many cold war gun SPAAs that can be found even down at 7.3, let alone at 7.7 or 8.0.
In an uptier R2Y2 can even see M247 and PGZ09, which have airburst tracer-less ammo and good radars, making them imposible to play against.
8 Likes
Chatgpt speaking about preferences it doesnt have
Even I, a player that sucks in top-tier ARB can do well in the F-2 ADTW, the skill floor isn’t even that high
It is
Better radar, on par missile kit
vastly superior flight performance in most regimes
A decent F-2A pilot will completely touch decent F-18C Early pilots without breaking a sweat
1 Like
“On par missile kit”
Feel free to think so.
You don’t even have an argument lmfao
1 Like
yeah okay but the bmpt is fine at wrost you can call it toxic
its been performing pretty poor its not that op anymore
its only good stats in overall is cause it was in the 10.3-10.7 bracket for a while so it good farm up insane stats
at 11.7 its just yeah strong but NOT op
Its got best fox 2 in the game with sparrows.
You are sayjng the pay wall P sparrows beat this?
Not used them but very doubtful
Playing the A6M5, good lord, this should not be fighting jet fighters AT all.
While I am good at turning, I am a literal flying static object to everything that is boom and zooming. My heart is pounding in frustration, not enjoyment.
Cause half the stuff im fighting are 6.0, 6.3, and 6.7 and somehow 7.0s.
Results: I see them; I turn; they do not; I usually get screwed over.
This thing is 4.3 property like it was before, not 5.7. Makes you wonder if any of the WT Developers who do Battle rating changes actually play this country at its actual BR or go into custom battles and adjust as they see fit rather than how the game functions.
AIM-7P, in my opinion, way better than -7M/F variants due to IG.
The Hornets also have bigger SARH pool at the ARH/SARH BR-bracket.
For that, you sacrifice:
- Good flight model
- AESA radar
- AAM-3s
As for the British and American hornets:
4. Countermeasures
Against the F-2A which is just better
3 things that the Nighthawk never had.
What’s next? AIM-9Ls for the Me-262?