So, what’s the reason for nerfing the T20?
Just the fact that people got hands?
It’s already where it should be but punishing people for playing it well is a bit much isnt it.
there was never a real one, except u want the wooden mockup
So the su30 premiums need to be moved up, they are a constant spammed nuisance at their br and every one lower that has to see them
Vehicle: HMS Enterprise
Gamemode: Naval Realistic
BR Change: 5.0 -----> 4.7
Reason:Lack of armor
That’s not just “some armor”.
All the Leopard 1A5s are moving down to 9.0, but I can’t find the C2A1 on the list.
Simple oversight or do the devs really believe that the little add on armor is worth the 0.3 BR increase.
So what about the VT4? T72B3A is planned to be reduced to 12.0, so why isn’t the VT4 lowered to 11.7? Is its performance better than the T72B3A?
Don’t forget the A-4s
The IRIAF as well xD
Vehicle: Char 25t
Gamemode: Ground RB
Change: 8.0 → 7.7
There honestly is no reason why this thing is still at 8.0, while it offers APHE over the solid AP from its 7.7 counterparts, it looses out on survivability and has to constantly face into enemies that are better in every singe way apart from reload. It has to face tanks it cannot pen anywhere but the side, has no stab, …
GRB Churchill 7/Crocodile 4.7 > 4.7 With removal M61 APHE and and re-entry М61 AP
Reason - the tank turned out to be too strong with the M61APHE and when moving up the BR, the armor factor in combination with a speed of 20 km/h will be leveled to such an extent that it will lead to the fact that the Churchills with APHE on 5.0 will be worse than they without it on 4.7.
atleast the IRIAF has teeth in the form of Fakour
Vehicle: AMX A-1A
Gamemode: Air Realistic
BR Change: 11.0 —> 10.7
it does not perform better in any form compared to the tech tree version
the flight performance is identical, the main armament is a tradeoff for more trigger time but less reliable velocity, the missiles are worse as their speed is limited by the airframe and the missiles bleed speed at such a rate that they don’t hit their maximum G load that would make them better, added with the flare hungryness that they perform more like an R-60m
whilst ground ordinance is practically the same
Venom FB.4 to 8.3 in realistic battles.
Given the speed and acceleration of the aircraft it is not suited for 8.7, especially its counter Mig15bis being at 8.3. With the top speed of 1045kph its impossible to perform at uptiers. It should be lowered to 8.3 so that it can see its actual counterparts and not 10+ year newer supersonic fighters
L-39ZA/ART Albatros (Japan): 7.3 => At least 8.0, even 8.3 at GRB.
Reason: Zunis + CCIP and flyes pretty well unless you go slow.
It can unrange SPAAs with the zoonies, even the early radar ones like M163, where its effective to like 1.5K
And does not make sence at same BR as MB-326K … CCIP on its own should add like .7 to its BR.
At ground it can do way more damage then even many 8.3 jets.
Can you find the one in the French tree
Vehicle: MiG-29KR
Gamemode: Air battles (All)
Changes: Add R-77-1 to loadout and BR increase from 13.7 → 14.0
Reason: Give the MiG-29KRs its full weapon loadout, since right now its weapons loadout leaves it without any real BVR weapons with only R-77s and R-73s. So giving it the R-77-1 would make it be able to have a BVR weapon and also make it somewhat unique from other fulcrums weaponry wise
Vehicle:Z15 Erich Steinbrinck
Gamemode: Naval Realistic
BR Change: 4.0 -----> 4.3
Reason: The AA guns firepower on it are too over power and do a lot damage on coastal ships, so it should be increased to 4.3, just like Kleber.
Vehicle: Russian tech tree
Change: all have 1.0 br increase
Reason: player statistic
Vehicle: Scimitar mk2
Gamemode: GRB
BR Change: 8.3 to 8.0 OR give it the experimental APFSDS
Reason: Even once thermals resolution is corrected to the “gen 3” setting (this is more correct to the real world resolution) the additional size and bulk of the vehicle is a far worse overall package to the 7.7 scimitar. It is not on par with the warrior ifv so should not be the same battle rating