I have tried, doesn’t work.
Tor outright out-ranges any thing I have, including the Kh29 and Kab bombs need to be dropped
from very close distances. Tor has 12km of range, kh29 has 10km.
Even if I lock a point on the ground with kh29, tor can 1. move and 2. intercept my missile.
And how am I supposed to even get a warning about a Tor spawning? And that how am I supposed to find it on the map if it spawned early and hid somewhere outside of spawn?
TOR is 11.3
and not really an issue since you can just minrange him no problem
TOR sucks at close range
You will be minranging him anyways
TOR is not a scary SPAA to fight
2S6 would be scarier, and it’s on your team
You do realize that Tor’s minimum range is only 700m, right? RIGHTTTT???
You have not even played the Su-30MKK, only the Su-30MK2, yet you unilaterally claim that the PL-12 is superior to the R-77. What’s more, you have not even flown any aircraft carrying the PL-12, yet you still make these baseless evaluations.
TOR simply won’t hit you from within 2km if you’re doing anything but flying straight towards it mate
Yak-130
Ground RB
9.3 → 10.3
The ability to carry 4x 500kg GBUs at 9.3, even 9.7, is absolutely ridiculous. In the hands of a minimally competent pilot, the Yak-130 can be basically untouchable and wipe a quarter to a third of the enemy team out in one sortie.
Other aircraft like the Q-5L which also carry guided bombs are at a higher BR, and they have smaller overall bomb loads (although the Q-5L is a better airframe).
what website is that?
I have not seen it before
Sure mate, looks like I was made out of skill issue as you stated multiple times and you just all talent.
Good luck to you. This conversation is getting nowhere.
yak-130 is not good enough for 10.3 grb lol
if it got an RWR and countermeasures sure
Well, I’m aware it has already been done, but those posts are missing a change that is also needed.
Mode: GRB & GAB
Vehicle: C2A1
Change: 9.3 → 9.0
Name fix to C2 (MEXAS)
Reason:
The MEXAS add-on armour doesn’t do anything for tank-to-tank combat and doesn’t help the tank to keep its BR. So it should be joining the other 1A5 variants in going down in BR.
There is no tank named C2A1 used by the Canadian army known as C2A1; the only thing to have used that name is a FAL gun. But because it’s the version with MEXAS armour, which didn’t have a unique name and is not the base Leo C2, it should have the armour name in brackets.
Related bug report: C2A1 wrong name
I’m a mid CAS player at best
But it’s simply an objective fact that the Su-25BM is busted
will trash a whole lot of 10.7 GRB planes quite easy still
The paper range is 700m, but in actual gameplay, it is very difficult to hit enemies even within 2km.
This is a website commonly used by Chinese players to check player data.
Ah, so something like statshark.
Looks like it’s also developed to work on mobile too
Statshark devs really need to up their game there
Vehicle: J-22M1A
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 11.0 —> 10.7 (stay at 10.7)
Reason: Compared to the A-10 Late, it has less munitions, no AAM, and the seekers on the Kosava are worse.
Using the Kosavas with MITL makes them less fire-and-forget than the mavericks, and it only carries 4. It takes much longer to get kills with these compared to true fire and forget missiles, since MITL can only control a single missile at a time. And the J-22 has so few munitions, and they each need to be launched separately, so they can very easily be intercepted by SPAA. And while controlling MITL, control is lost on the plane, so it is very easy to kill.
Moving it to 11.0 will make it face more SPAA systems that can intercept it’s missiles, and even the plane itself, which is slow. This will force J-22 players to stay far away (>10km) from the battlefield, which means they will be lucky to even get a single missile on target before the match ends, since the Kosavas are not very fast.
This is already the case in 10.7, the matches are short and the SP cost of the plane is high (800 SP). The plane is spawned, takes a minute or 2 to get into position, then launch 1 Kosava, switch to MITL and guide it to target, takes 1 minute, then launch another one. Repeat. It’s taken the J-22M1A 5-6 minutes to launch 4 missiles. While the A-10 can fly to the battlefield, quickly launch all 6 mavericks, and disengage, that’s 3 minutes to launch 6 missiles. The A-10 can overwhelm SPAA and distract them with the aircraft, while the J-22 with Kosavas cannot do this.
The plane without MITL would be 10.3 or even 10.0, since the Kosavas are equivalent to early TV mavericks. Having MITL doesn’t make the Kosavas better, it makes them usable at this high BR. Considering the drawbacks of MITL, it shouldn’t justify 11.0.
At 10.7 the J-22 had a line-up, now at 11.0 it’s going to be hard to justify up-BR’ing the 10.7 line up just for this plane, considering the points above. Additionally this plane is rank 6, a 11.0 plane has no place at rank 6.
There is also the economical view, this premium plane was just released at a low rank, and now it’s going up to a BR that has never been seen in that rank. This will make me rethink pre-ordering vehicles in the future, if it is inevitable they get “nerfed” shortly after release.
I would like to hear the justification on the BR increase.
A6E TRAM
When A6E is moved to version 11.0, it should obtain AGM78.
Leopard 1 A5 (all)
9.3 → Stay 9.3
This is once again a symptom of terrible BR compression in this bracket. The Leopard 1A5 is largely an inferior tank compared to “Gen 2” MBTs like the T-72, ZTZ96, XM1, etc., but it is far too powerful to be clubbing 8.0 tanks that are unstabilized and are mostly firing APDS or APHE.
I made this point in a post during the April 2026 BR changes, and to summarize:
The rate at which tanks between 8.0 and 8.7 acquire both stabilizers AND APFSDS munitions means that the performance difference between the average 8.0 tank and 8.7 tank is very extreme. The introduction of stabilizers, APFSDS, and laser rangefinders needs to be more gradual in order to make the matchups of 7.3 vs 8.3, 7.7 vs 8.7, 8.0 vs 9.0, and 8.3 vs 9.3 less unfair. This must be done by raising the BR ceiling and moving most 9.0+ vehicles up in BR together in order to give the 7.7-9.3 bracket more breathing space.
Yes, this website is similar to statshark in functionality, but it only has the feature to query player data, without the other features that statshark has. However, it can be used on mobile phones and on the Chinese version of Telegram, which is more convenient when you don’t have access to a computer.
That’s pretty cool to know
