I’m just disappointed, I bought a T58 on BR 8.0 then 8.3. For the setup on 8.3 I bought a T54E1, spent gold, then the developers give it BR 8.7, well, I put it in the setup XM803, played for a few months and today they write that XM and MBT are being transferred to 9.0 and 9.3, I will not have a setup for T58 again. I understand that the developers are making life difficult for beginners who will be the feed for tanks 10.3 (and this is the gold setup of the USSR nation in the game) why in XM803 a shell with a penetration of 280mm and a reload time of 7.5 seconds should play against the T-72 and T64, which have 450+ penetration, even the Soviet T62M1 has 420 penetration, why don’t the tanks that raise BR get any improvements? Is this a byte for buying equipment from the exchange at 9.3? Or a byte for buying pre-tanks with br 10.0-10.7?
bruh i was enjoying the re2005 vdm in air rb at br 6 its fair , there is no reason to buff it at 6.3
It honestly would be fine with sparrows at 11.0 still. The radar is awful and while it’s fast and has good countermeasures for the BR, it has rear aspect only, flare hungry 9Js and goes against MTI/PD aircraft with far better missiles and better flight performance in most aspects.
That’s why you wait a few months to a year before buying a very anticipated and probably under BR’D vehicle to see if it’s worth it for a long term lineup
Yeah, Hetzer gets frontally penetrated by ridiculous shots for whatever reason. Front armor is nice, but even if it shows like the tinies sliver of side, it’s ded.
Also slow and 8s reload when aced. Hit the track, smoke, murder.
If people were using smoke, a lot of casemate TDs would have to go up in BR.
Suggestion: Freccia: No changes
Reason: Spikes are extremely inconsistent and should not be a reason it is going up, being a 9.3 chassis to begin with
Absolutely, this thing is fun, but does not warrant such a high BR. All the AMX-13s are at least 0.7 higher than they need to be
F2 13.7 - 13.3
4 of the worst fox 3, bad AESA feels more like mechanical scan. No HMS
The SPz gets 17 degrees of depression on both its sides and something like -15 when aiming back on top of also having a 20mm to deal with low flying planes.
The FIAT can only get -17 on one side and it doesn’t have a secondary auto cannon, And its wheeled so moving into position especially on an incline to get that side on target can feel clunky.
The M50 cant fully rotate its guns and has way less gun depression, On top of the fact all its guns count as the same module so its even easier to hit/disable if it tries to hull down.
Any map with large hills it beats both easily.
JF17 13.3- 13.0
Dodgy / slow FM. Low Cm count. 4 Fox 3. No HMS
13.0 worthy all day
BTW, I’d take a signle Shvak with 180 rounds over 3 MG151/20, as Shvak kills in 1-2 shots and has way better ballistics. 3P has A LOT better armanent than G.55 S1
I’ve had a few situations where all I got was a few hits vs P51H and Tempest because MG151/20 also has pretty bad belts.
Vehicle: Cruiser Mk III & Cruiser Mk III (3RTR) (incorrectly titled A13 Mk I & A13 Mk I (3rd R.T.R.)
Gamemode: All
Class Change: Light Tank→ Medium Tank
Reason: Cruiser tanks were the main type used for tank-on-tank combat and exploitation in British doctrine. Light tanks such as the Light Tank Mk VI and Tetrarch or armoured cars such as the Daimler, Coventry, Humber, etc were used for the reconnaissance role.
far better than AV-8B+ or FA2 so shouldnt be same BR
Make argument for harrier to be lowered
Yes and no, the Centauros are not so BR sensitive his du to their play style anyways. This change probably won’t affect it much. At any rate I’m more concerned with the AMV still at 12.3 with the armour of a 10.7 (and a couple spall liners).
F-16AJ is in a worse position being a F-16A block 10 just with ability to carry x2 aim 7f and not only IR caps, it is literally being uptiered to 13.7 always and gets shotdown by 12.3 machinery like F/A-18a
I’m much more concerned over the fact that people are fighting these shermans in terrible tanks like the M15/42 than I am about new players, but the new players existing impact how these battles play out and this impacts how well these vehicles do in battle. You’re latching onto a secondary concern of mine, not the main concern.
The Sherman 105 happens to be another tank I’ve made a post on how it should be increased in BR too.
JAGPANZER IV
Ground RB
4.3-> 4.7
3.3 M4A1s and T34s should not be facing such a tank in uptiers as there is very little they can do the armor on this tank makes it immune to 75MM and russian 76MMs with no way of avoiding it unless you flank it which if they have a teamate will not work things like KV1 L11 have zero chance of wining due to low mobility its quite unfair to fight not to mention the Potent german 75mm which can frontally one shot all named vehicles
Nelson / Rodney
Give these ships their historically correct 30 second reload rate. Move their BRs to 8.0 if necessary. They will make a nice linueup with KGV.
(Bug Report that was disregarded)
Developers considered it unnecessary to further increase the rate of fire.
The situation in Naval has changed since then. Rodney/Nelson are not top ranked ships. If their performance improves from a reload buff then they can go up in br.
AJ to 12.3 or give it 4- 6 sparrows like the jap order demanded