Planned Battle Rating Changes (April 2026)

Has to be one vehicle per post.

Air realistic battles.

Vehicle: Mirage 4000.

BR change: 13.0 to 12.7.

Reason: It is currently the same BR as superior vehicles Su-27, Su-33, J-11, JAS39A.
That and F-15A is 12.7 now.

Gaijin incorrectly has those superior vehicles at 13.0 without moving worse aircraft down.
Make a decision Gaijin. Keep pushing vehicles down, or fix things by moving the superior vehicles up.

5 Likes

because of the upcoming sales. It wont sell alot when its balanced and not facing fox1 carriers

C13 T90 being moved up to 7.3 feels like you’ve thrown a dart into a dartboard and chose a random vehicle to move up.

In what world is a light tank that’s currently sitting at 49% winrate and 0.62 kills per spawn in need of an increase? It’s massively underperforming at 7.0 currently. What is the reasoning behind this change, other than it was selected at random.

2 Likes

Air RB - VB.10-02

Move from 4.7 to 4.0.

It is a copy of the VB.10C, but 0.7 higher when the only advantage it has over it is 6 M2 .50s in addition to 4 hispanos. The added firepower does not offset the large increase in weight, and therefore they should be the same BR.

A-4E Early

Ground Realistic

9.3 β†’ 10.0

IF the SAMs get moved up, then the A-4E Early would have to move aswell as it’s one of the only balanced 9.0-10.0 CAS planes.

right, because you can event shoot back right? well simple than, give gripen a 2 rb 99s and leave it at same br.

They balance the game by silver earnt. Most important stat for Β£, least for gameplay

does it really? damn i gotta change my cheiftain post

Yet again. Stingers are not good missiles, and yes it should be a higher br than the ozelot due to the gun, but that would mean the ozelot going down, not the gepard going up. Please tell me you do not seriously think the gepard with stingers is as good as the tunguska.

1 Like

B-52
8.7 β†’ 7.7 ~ 8.0
The BUFF irl is capable of taking missiles to the face and flying perfectly fine, while also being at insanely high altitudes which most aircraft cant reach. This is not modelled and likely never will be in war thunder, as such, it makes the B-52 rather useless in ARB, and in ground RB its practically impossible to use against radar SPAA which can very easily destory you low altitude, or just dodge high altitude bombs
TU-95
8.3 β†’ 7.3 ~ 7.7
Similar to the B-52 with durability and altitude issues, except it doesnt even have a decent bomb payload to compensate, the FAB-9000 is awful, and its top speed can be matched by most super props, let alone jets

F-16C 13.7 β†’ 13.3 | 6 aim-120A against 8 on F-15 MSIP and also not the best radar.

Just
decompress

Skill issue.

F/A-18A 12.3 β†’ 12.7 | 4 AIM 7M and 2 AIM 9L against Mirage 2000C-S4 with usless 530D, weak radar and and lack of countermeasures is wild

1 Like

Air RB - G.56

Move from 6.3 to 6.0 as it is worse than the P-51H, and not significantly better than the Yak-3U.

2 Likes

says the guy who is saying stingers are op

ragebait used to be belivable

1 Like

F/A-18C (Early) 12.7 β†’ 13.0 | second best SARH missile in the game, which he can carry 6 pieces and 2 9L shoud be at least on the same br with Mig-29 (9-13), also have better electronics

Indeed on your end

All Mig-29’s in game should be on 0.3 br lower. Generaly speaking all of them under performing in comparison with f-15, su-27, su-30 etc.

The sams do not need to move up, so the a4e can stay where it is. If anything it is actually a bit overperforming more than it is balanced.