Using last month only ie March 2026 you can clearly see the difference
1 Like
People asked for the mk 22 to be dropped to 6.3 last BR change. This update we get mk24 increase instead. Its crazy work.
yes, whats your point about gripen fm than? doesnt matter if it goes down
Necesito saber porque injustamente no esta ahi, Los siguientes vehiculos y que si o si deben subir su br
-SU-30 MK2 AMV RB 13.7 / GB 12.7
-MIG-29M (9-15) RB 14.0
-T-90 BR 11.7
-T-72 ARENA RB 11.7
-OBJECT 292 RB 11.0
-2S25M RB 10.7
donde estan sabiendo como perjudica todos los enemigos de ese mismo br
BI stills at 6.7?
Surprise.
Damn the iraf is by far the most played f14
Aircraft:
Kfir C10
Mode:
Air Simulator Battles
Proposed change:
13.0 - 13.3
Reasoning:
The kfir C10 is arguably one of the strongest 13.0 planes with its kit of 4 Derbys and an *AESA radar. Combined with its top speed and acceleration allows it to be basically untouchable at altitude.
No Plane or Missile in the 12.0-13.0 lobby can catch a C10 at altitude, while the C10 can maintain very good situational awareness with its good radar and dictate every fight it gets into.
This creates a situation where planes are at the mercy of the C10 and its Derby’s allowing it to push very aggressively at altitude, rain derby’s and escape to the Airfield just to do it over again.
This superiority isnt exclusive to high alt missile spamming. With its HMD + Derby’s, the Kfir C10 can be very aggressive on the deck, utilizing techniques like vertical notching to quickly get in and out of the notch which the Derby capitalizes from with its high maneuverability and acceleration.
No plane at 13.0 has the capability to rule the skies like the kfir C10 does.
I believe at 13.3 it will finally see planes that have the armament to deal with the C10
It’s OP at 9.0, that was a typo.
False.
Complete and total skill issue to due to an Aim-7C.
No it doesn’t, it’s bad at 9.7. It has no flares, chaff, or missiles.
Unironically they are only worth an 0.3 BR difference. The Su-7 has a much better dogfighting model, but it is a lot slower.
The point of my protest suggestions is to point out how badly Gaijin has screwed up.
There’s a reason this is now in all the posts as part of the reason:
My ideal is all the vehicles listed in reason are moved up and we get like 15.3 - 15.7 max BR out of this, but even if any of these suggestions make it through then that only proves my suspicions.
If my suggestions are going to be denied anyway, I want them to deny them for good reasons.
Cause I am sick of not being able to play vastly worse aircraft because they share the same BRs as twin engine [and some times single engine] beasts.
3 Likes
the gripen has the 3rd best FM in the game, it’s equivalent would be the 12.7 F-16s with 9M and Magic 2 which the gripen completely stomps.
The gripen also has a metric buttload of countermeasures making it one of the best planes in the game defensively.
Again, compression is NOT the solution, decompression is.
Spoiler
MiG-29 vs gripen go brrrrrr
1 Like
What? can you explain yourself here
good to see u that in this community Russian hate is much alive have fun in your little world…
You have a special way of speaking that makes people appreciate your silence
8 Likes
USA
F-16C 13.7 → 13.3 | 6 aim-120A against 8 on F-15 MSIP and also not the best radar.
F/A-18A 12.3 → 12.7 | 4 AIM 7M and 2 AIM 9L against Mirage 2000C-S4 with usless 530D, weak radar and and lack of countermeasures is wild
F/A-18C (Early) 12.7 → 13.0 | second best SARH missile in the game, which he can carry 6 pieces and 2 9L shoud be at least on the same br with Mig-29 (9-13), also have better electronics
USSR
Mig-29 (9-12) | usless in game, just remove it
All Mig-29’s in game should be on 0.3 br lower. Generaly speaking all of them under performing in comparison with f-15, su-27, su-30 etc.
Japan
F-16AJ 12.7 - 12.3 | 2 AIM 7F(not even 7M) and 4 AIM 9L generaly worse than any F/A-18
F-2A ADTW 13.0 → 12.7 | should be same br as F-15 due to same loadouts and electronics
F-2A 13.7 → 13.3 | worse in all aspects in comparison with f-15J(M)
France
Mirage F1C (all variations) 12.0 → 11.7 | Have usless radar and cant compete with other jets (especiaslly with F-14/Vigens/etc.)
Mirage 2000C-S4 12.3 → 12.0 | weak Matra 530D and bad radar + huge lack of countermeasures.
Mirage 2000C-S5 change is good. Same as S4 but have more countermeasures and MAW
Mirage 4000 13.0 → 12.7 | Weak radar, still useless 530D, no HMS. worse almost in every aspect than Su-27 or Su-33.
Some of the changes can be exchangeble, like Mig-29(9-13) move to 12.7 and developers don’t touch F/A-18C(early). I think you’ll get it))
1 Like
P-51H
ARB 6.3 → 6.7
It has better performance than the Spitfire Mk22 and even the Mk24 so it shouldn’t be lower than them
5 Likes
Oh they would never
They re abs fine with this and KT with proper turret being 6.7; as they’re absolutely fine with KT with SLA engine being exactly same 6.7 BR as well.
Ozelot
Ground Realistic
9.7 → 10.3
IRCCM missiles facing 8.7s and 9.0s is kinda ridiculous.
2 Likes
Yak-3U
ARB 5.7 → 6.0/6.3
With the Spitfire LF Mk9 finally going up you shouldn’t forget about the other 5.7 powerhouse
7 Likes
2 Likes
I dont hate russia. Just the fact other nations get nerfed while they dont. If spits were moved up with yaks too then fair. Other examples like the BI- spitfire now higher BR. Look at the stats for Bi and Spitfire. Only 1 conclusion remains…
1 Like