The 2005s were just soooo oppressive and totally not borderline overtiered at 6.0. Not like they get dogged on by every other fighter at their br or anything. These changes prove the genius of balancing around player stats.
10 Likes
A-4B sure, A-4E why?
1 Like
I only play a few BRs in ground and 4.7 GB is a fat RIP :(
Same, it was the only Israeli plane that was actually fun to play
2 Likes
Vehicle: HMS Enterprise
Gamemode: Naval Realistic
BR Change: 5.0 -----> 4.7
Reason:Lack of armor
1 Like
Eh right now they are kind of comparable, the VDM is definitely a lot better in climb though.
VDM is still heavily underperforming
1 Like
80% win rate? sounds like squadron play, good luck playing this solo at 9.3
Kurnass 2000 12.3 → 11.7
With only non-irccm IR guided missiles, the Kurnass 2000 is much weaker compared to any other plane it faces. At 11.7, it would be at a BR to equal opponents (MiG-23ML/D with 6x IR missiles/2x Radar)
28 Likes
i am practically solo in 95% of my games 👍
1 Like
SUGGESTION:
Challenger 3 (TD):
OPTION 1: lower BR to 11.7; so its higher penetration vs lower rate of fire is truly a sidegrade to the rest of the base Challengers.
OPTION 2: reduce the reload to 5 seconds, like every other Challenger tank, and make it 12.7.
Why keep it at 12.0 the way it is? It has no lineup there, it is pointless.
It should either remain nerfed as a 11.7, or increase its rate of fire and make it a proper 12.7; at 12.0 with this reload it fulfills no role at all.
10 Likes
F14 IRIAF is gonna struggle so hard at 13.3 because of crappy radar and horrendous RWR even with the 6x Fakours. Can we at least get the R73 on it since it was tested and was actually more successful than R27? Also can the F14B get 9M and F14A get 9L, with the F15’s and F16’s at 12.7 with 9M’s this wouldn’t be broken anymore
8 Likes
For ARB the F8U going to 10.0 should not happen, I cannot stress this point enough.
The flight performance of the F8U is actually slightly better than the F8E that sits at 10.7 and the missile kit is almost the same. This plane has no bussiness being moved down to 10.0 and 9.0 planes should NOT have to deal with it.
It was previously at 10.0 before and was an absolute menace to the BR bracket before it was rightly moved up to 10.3.
Please do not move this plane down as it does not need it and it’s flight performance is already good for it’s current BR.
21 Likes
I understand your point, but it only gets 6 missile. Considering most player can easily notch any missile at longer range, why waste them at targets at 40km+ range? And bellow 40km range isn’t 120A better?
I retract the “say wallahi” lmao sorry bro
Vehicle: C13 T90
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: Stay 7.0 or 7.0 -----> 6.7
Reason:Lack of armor, insufficient ammunition, and inconvenience main gun firepower
28 Likes
Vehicles: P-51H-5-NA
Gamemode: Air Realistic
BR Change: 6.3 -----> 6.7/7.0
Reason: if the Spitfire mk. 24 is going up to 7.0, the other best superprop in the game has to go up too. The P-51H cannot be lower than the Spitfire mk. 22, which is worse in every regard besides turning
31 Likes
Yeah, but I find it much more boring to play. It wouldn’t cost the devs anything to make the modules cost less XP, or give helicopters more XP in GRB, or any other solution that doesn’t force players to play the awful helicopter PvE mode.
People will eat Fakours and refuse to learn even in eurofighters.
Then claim the awareness check missile is op
6 Likes