You’ve never touched the F-14 IRIAF in your life and you have a 45% winrate in your spaded F-14A please stop talking man
3 Likes
Mirage 2000C-S5 going down to 12.3 to be the same as the Mirage 2000D and now lower than the D-RMV.
Why does Gaijin think that the strike Mirages need to be so high in ARB? Especially now with the S5 going down why are they staying high when they have worse flight performance than the S5 and only having 2 missiles when the S5 gets 4.
8 Likes
Lmaooooo bro it’s an Italian vehicle
3 Likes
F8U2 no change needed
Didnt we learn anything from that thing being there a year ago? Its just way too oppressive to be put at that BR again, where already a certain Ayit sits that performs really well due to its missile kit. This will be the same but with better everything
8 Likes
Aircraft:
Mig-23MLD
Mode:
Air RB and Air AB
Proposed change:
11.7 → 12.0
Reasoning:
The plane’s FM is very solid and fast; it could very easily be moved to 12.0 with the introduction of the R-73 and R-24M, but only if the radar gets fixed.
4 Likes
Vehicle: F-16AJ
Gamemode: Air Simulator
BR Change: 13.0 → 12.7 or 12.3
Reason: with just two sparrows and 9Ls there is absolutely no reason for this plane to be at the same br as an F-2A in sim. this plane is comparable to the F-18A Early if not maybe worse. I see no reason for it to be at 13.0
11 Likes
Vehicle: BMPT (tech tree one)
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR change: 11.7 → 12.0
Reason:
Unlike the BMPT72 the regular TT BMPT features a much stronger side ERA plating increasing its survivability and 2 extra crewmembers that are increasing survivability of a penetrative shot by 100% compared to BMPT72 (instead of 2 crewmembers dying 4 must die in order for the vehicle to be killed).
BMPT is already an extremely survivable vehicle with more than capable offensive weaponry that let it be played without an issue at 12.7+ battle rating and given that it is way more superior to BMPT 72 it should be reflected in its BR placement above BMPT72.
33 Likes
nothingburger
1 Like
Or make the electronic equipement in turret actually work as FCS in other TDs… meaning if damaged not able to fire that would actually be fair since they made it TD just to give it the ammo box.
1 Like
wdym😔
Is there no Simulator BR changes?
F-14 IRAF is crazy good in Air Sim and it’s getting 6 Fakours but there’s no sim changes?
3 Likes
WR is meaningless because its heavily tied on when you spade your plane. It’s all about personal performance, and your stats talk loud and clear.
You are crying because they are putting up the handholding machine. Simple as
Yet another BR change without the Antelope going down to an appropriate BR, it took you lot a year for your 2 brain cells to find out it was not, in fact, equal to Strela, so how about moving it down to 9.3? It’s still signicantly worse at locking than any other IR SPAA in game.
4 Likes
It doesnt,which is what i am pointing at. SK105 doesnt have stab meanwhile 103 does. Which is why i am saying they arent same as the guy i quoted said.
With the F-16 Sufa now going to 13.7 the F-16C need to finally gets aim120Cs
1 Like
Vehicle: Alpha Jet A
Mode: Air RB
Your BR change: 8.7 → 9.0
If you want to move the Alpha Jet A up in ARB, than atleast reconsider improving the engine to the C-20 which they should allready have…
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/vdYlubrz0UEz
Edit: the Thai Alphas have for some Unknown reason allready the C-20 engine…
19 Likes
Not like 120Cs will help it, they’re a complete downgrade in every relevant metric
If I needed handholding then why am I deeply positive with the F-14B (now the second worst F-14) and have a 55% winrate in it??
Move A-5C to 10.3 in ARB, this aircraft has low survivability at BR 10.7 because it only has 18 countermeasures dan severe compression at transonic speed
9 Likes
How will that benefit F-16C?