My prayers to you
What could possibly take that spot in the Swede TT?
Don’t worry it’s hell
Ground RB.
Sherman II 3.7 → 3.3
Remove T45.
The Sherman II is a 1-1 copy-paste of the M4A1’s that are at 3.3, The one and only difference is its ability to carry T45, That as far as im aware, The British didn’t use.
It should lose T45 for historical reasons and be dropped to match the other A1 models.
APCR is useless the majority of the time anyway when its APHE does the job just fine vs 99% of the things you face, So having it is not much of a benefit anyway.
1 Like
Eeeeeh I get your point but I disagree because AIM-9M/L-I isn’t R-73
and in that term, Mirage 2000D-RMV need to rot at 12.7BR forevermore while C-S5 now become 12.3BR. because of HMD.
Since neither Tonka is capable of TVC-IRM, SARH, ARH, the specification gap between having HMD or not is not as big as we think
Plane: kfir c2/7
Mode: Air RB
Proposed change: (c2)11.7/(c7)12.0 → (c2)11.0/(c7)11.3
(c2)Equipped with only 2× Python 3 missiles (no IRCCM) at 11.7 is inconsistent with comparable IR-only fighters.
(c7)Four Python 3 missiles (no IRCCM) at 12.0 is inconsistent with the missile technology available at this BR
4 Likes
RDAF Spitfire HF Mk IXe
E type wings with a later Merlin engine and unique to Denmark and technically the only vehicle they could get.
RDAF Spitfire HF Mk IXe - A mixed bunch
Yak-3U should absolutely move up to 6.0 as well, I agree, but I think the other Yaks are fine right now. Maybe Yak-3 to 4.7, and Yak-3P to 5.3, but those are the only others that would make some sense. Honestly, I’d rather Gaijin not move up the A6Ms, N1K1, or 190 A-8s if I was able to make changes to the suggested Prop tier BRs.
Regardless though, the Spitfire LFs needed their BR increased.
4 Likes
There is literally nothing there to suggest they are worse at it, actually the higher TNT suggests they’re better than amraams at this.
Absolutely not. I suggest actually trying before saying something like this again
BMPTs Still lower BR then the RDF/LT and HSTVL
Plane: F-4E Kurnass 2000
Mode: Air RB
Proposed change: 12.3 → 12.0
6× IR missiles (Python 3/AIM-9L) with no radar-guided options
2 Likes
at this point euthanize the japanese naval fighter line 💔
Hunter F.1
Ground Realistic
9.0 → 8.7
The Hunter F.1 is currently at 8.7 in ARB, but somehow this plane that is an pure fighter with only 4x30mm ADEN is at a higher BR in GRB than in ARB.
It is an aircraft with NO armament made for ground attack, and it is higher BR in GRB than in ARB.
It has no bombs.
It has no rockets.
It has no missiles.
It has no counter measures.
It only have 4x 30mm cannons with a maximum pen of 37mm.
The only targets it can take out, is realistically SPAA, however that requires that it gets the jump on SPAA with radar, and it is at the BR where it has a high chance to also face off against SAM.
3 Likes
I legitimately have put off playing my favorite plane the 109 G-6 and many other 4.7 br plantes as you constantly get uptiered. Now I just need the Yak-3UFO to get the same treatment
3 Likes
Iv got most jets in the game. F2 has a cracked FM which doesnt come into play at all at this BR as it doesn’t turn when its going fast so that energy and god tier pull at slow speeds is pretty redundant
The M4A1 is very strong where it’s at just because of how good the combination of M61 APHE and a stabilizer is. It’s one of the main vehicles creating compression at 3.3 imo.
Ignoring the APCR, the Sherman II is technically better than the US and French M4A1’s currently since the armor modeling is done more historically accurate, meaning the hull corners and front roof are less of a weakspot from head-on. The Sherman II’s armor model needs to be applied to other early M4A1s so that they can all go up.
5 Likes
Stirling B Mk III
ARB & GRB
4.7 → 4.3/4.0
The Mk III is near identical to the Mk I, but somehow that justfies a BR difference of 0.7, instead of them being same BR. It is not even because they have any difference in armaments. They are more in effect, the same aircraft, and there is no reason to research and play the Mk III, when you are going through the techtree.
1 Like
The Kurnass 2000 should probably go down to 11.7, especially if your proposed Kfir BR changes got added.
so far i’ve read a lot of arguments trying to defend the BMPT are absolutely atrocious, either comparing the survivability to the PUMA or outright trying to use the irl price per unit as a measurment unit
ZSU-23-4M2
GRB
7.3 → 7.7
It have extremely effective anti aircraft guns, mounted on a okay mobile platform with a lot of turret traverse, meaning that it tear apart any planes that it faces. The plane it faces doesn’t even have a chance against it, since most of them are WW2 or just post war planes, with low manoeuvrability. Even without a radar, because of its high traverse speed, and high velocity ammo, it has no major problem engaging faster moving targets at close range, or planes further away within reasonable distance. Also with it having 4000 rounds of ammunition + an extra 4000 round from the ammo box, it is near impossible for it to run out of ammo.
3 Likes