i might said the wrong but yeah hq9
I mean it will be cool if they one day added spacecrafts.
The Chinese SPAA systems from now on are pretty limited though, and half their predecessors are butchered so I have little hopes unless they get a fully Russian system anything will change.
same goes for patriot right ? i would not based my view on a sams based on irl events as there are a lot to consider that are not implemented in the game
I mean it depends, since the Chinese are that much better at keeping things, especially from the past two decades secretive, since there’s no need to disclose any to congress or what ever.
And the only conflict ever attended by them is pretty much the ‘5.7’ one and that is too recent for more info.
I think that the amraam-er is quite good. Also we need anti-radiation missiles before something like the patriot can be added.
the NASAMS 3 is really good for point defense, but we’d need Anti-radiation missiles first. Though I do need to say this, the Patriot’s radar can’t do a continuous 360 degree search. The radar is fixed and has to be manually oriented in the direction that an attack is believed to come from. It has a FOV of 120 degrees and 60 degrees to look up. Gaijin can add the LTAMDS radar which is an AESA radar that is able to have a continuous 360 degree search due to it having multiple fixed AESA radars facing different directions.
Edit: I might be wrong about some of the information regarding the rotation of the AN/MPQ-65 so please correct if so and I’d like to see a video of the AN/MPQ-65 rotating because I can’t find one lol
1 Like
And also Patriot is not a lone system, more radar systems are used to provide a much more complete picture, not just reliant on the radar to search a large portion of the sky.
I need to ask, since I made suggestion about the LvS 103 (Swedish Patriot Pac-3) and waiting for it to get posted, can the TPY-4 radar provide Datalink and be used to track targets if the AN/MPQ-65 is offline or no? I just want clarification
Not an american radar expert. Think it has link 16 so should be able to have some form of datalink.
Edit: just got GPT to do the work, seems like it does have data link but there are certain infrastructures needed.
1 Like
“No we don’t” - CAS Main
1 Like
You think I’m a cas main.
Lol
1 Like
I agree remove NASAMs from the US and give everyone else Patriot except the US
2 Likes
That’s someone joggin the noggin right there
Its a cope post im not gonna take it seriously
1 Like
👍👍👍
I love how he used US and NATO as if US isn’t a NATO country.
Well considering the game is a cope itself thats fair. But nothing even compares to the BUK in game
Just covering the bases lol US should obviously get it 1st
I don’t see an issue with adding Patriots, I don’t believe getting air defenses with longer ranges than what we currently have will have much impact anyway.
2 Likes