Geez.
hmm good
Didnt u wanna look in the books for the igel weight etc? Found anything?
trying to access to my books yet
I’m at dorm now :((((((
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/4Q3o2qyB2y9l
therefore I re-creat this report.
and it passed, nice
How do they know it is not a clear marketing lie?
Curious…
The best part is they use the BW page as Source, I remember on an diffrent report longer ago they said BW page isnt good enough as source…
I lost my faith in the handling of sources by Gaijin since they didn’t give one for the nerf of the Leopards last update.
It was a ‘historical’ change, yes, but no sources were given or named by them.
There might be a somewhat not so declassified (I really don’t know, I asked and noone could clearly say) manual from the Netherlands stating the limits, but no sources were given.
And then they ask for sources that state that you could override the FCS in the Leopards to drop the barrel. The hyporacy. Unbelievable.
But hey, Gaijin is allowed to use everything they want, even classified documents, disregard anything they don’t like and if good sources are given, fancy-talk thier way out of them. We think, we assume, we believe. (Stinger looks like Igla, therefore same performance; marketing lie, …)
Also interesting that Russian numbers are always right and can be trusted at face value, but other countiers clearly overstate performance in marketing lies…
no!!!!!
That 10 seconds does not even make any sense whatsoever.
100% TRASH worth 6.0 only
even m109 ARMOR BETTER THEN IT hahahahahaha
13 seconds base reload wtf…
spall liners also missing, and the bustle rack is still badly made (only one hitbox, way too large.
They also revered the fixes for the turret speed… LOL
and the shells are garbage 107 shells it never used
armor hole on the roof still there… any HE hit will pass right though and over pressure kill the entire crew
Bustle door wall still missing too…
and classic “germ” Giant internal components