Yeah, this is what I was hoping for with the GMTI on the Typhoon, but the Tpod (at least the last time I checked) didnt snap to the radar lock and so for now its just useful for finding something. Which is really annoying
Had one of those “hang on a second” moments
Doesn’t really change much I don’t think. But shouldn’t the Tornado F3 have Skyflash TEMPs instead of Skyflash DFs?
It should, but performance wise there is no difference between them, so probably just Gaijin not being bothered to change the name.
2 Likes
it’s an old name, meant to differentiate between AIM-7E that have delayed guidance compared to Skyflash and AIM-7E2 that almost have instant guidance
so TEMP means Tornado Embodied Modification Package, and is the list of modifications required to fire a Skyflash from a Tornado. You literally can’t fit a non-temp missile to the aircraft as the ejection mechanism is different, thats what @Morvran was questioning.
1 Like
Theoretically it’s an interim solution in the game to represent select missiles that were physically field modified by ordinance-men to enable Dogfight timings & coefficients to be used for use on aircraft that either didn’t have, or prior to the prevision and installation of the “Dogfight” series of computer mechanization to permit the electrical selection of the two presets as called for based on the launch conditions prior to launch, one optimized for longer range the other short range.
This was before sufficiently small electronics being developed to permit the Sparrow to optimally adjust in-flight to the conditions which occurred with the -7F.
The “Dogfight” Sparrow should really only be available to the US F-4C & F-4D / -4E (and even then only for a “Early” 'Nam variant which we don’t have a concrete configuration for), but then other aircraft with them should have the relevant computer integrated into the FCR so should be similarly capable.
It’s really just a hold over from Gaijin that they have yet to revise and likely never will. not that their -7F, or the later Sparrow modeling accurately reflects how they should fly either. But it’s hard to get things changed.
2 Likes
Thought so and yeah, I doubt it will be fixed
oh sorry, lol I’m missing the point here.
Did the Tornado Gr4 ever use a Twin bomb carrier on the wing pylons for the Paveway IV?
Nah, the Paveways need a MIL 1773 Bus, you can’t wire that through the twin carrier.
1 Like
I wondered if it had the same carriers used on the Typhoon
Almost certainly not haha.
Ah damn. There goes that plan for mass PW4 drops in SB :P
I don’t know if you guys already have this but this is part of some product brochure from the early tornado series, though it may be enough proof to implement the Martel on the GR.1, as long as y’all have something else that supports this
2 Likes
Yup
Was reported a while ago, but hasnt come yet