Not the first time they’ve “forgot” about us.
is it viable to replace the tornado GR 1 with the gripen in ground RB?
also flying the F.3 againstSU-27 and F-15A is intressting even if its historically accurate
but you also see downtiers against F5Cs XD
you can take both.
after spawn the fighter , the respawn point for the strike aircraft will not be doubled.
1 Like
nah first slot is taken by the harrier
but i might get a new crew anyway
2 Likes
Surely TIALD would be gen 2 at least?
DevilO6
December 15, 2023, 9:25am
1965
Tiald 500 yea, 400 Nope. Unless they decide where it will finally go, as tiald is between 1st and 2nd gen in game
Wasnt gaijin also planning to give the german tornados Litening II Gen 3 thermals and then nerfed them back to Gen 1?
DevilO6
December 15, 2023, 9:27am
1967
Yes they did, but it was gen 2+
Isnt 1080x720 considered Gen3?
DevilO6
December 15, 2023, 9:30am
1969
Gen 2+, it is wrong here should be 1080/720, was changed last month
any information about the BK27?
and sweden BK27 got PELE-T
1 Like
Gunjob
December 15, 2023, 10:02am
1971
Got plenty of info on the BK27, but as far as I can tell we didn’t use the PELE-T, and in game the PELE-T functions exactly like APHE anyway.
1 Like
DevilO6
December 15, 2023, 10:04am
1972
I hate that the first bullet in the belt, that is usually a simple ball to blow the seal and clear the barrel, repeats itself in game, due to how belts are made
With the new stuff, the F.3 is quite okay if you are not facing top tier, but the FGR 2 must go down it has no buissness fighting J-11/Su-27/Mig29/F-15
6 Likes
I hate that the first bullet in the belt, that is usually a simple ball to blow the seal and clear the barrel, repeats itself in game, due to how belts are made
Is that honestly how it works?
God they are worse than I thought lol
2 Likes
From latest patch notes:
F-16 (all variants), MiG-29 (all variants) Yak-141 (all variants), Harrier AV-8C, J-8F, JH-7A, Mirage 2000-5F, Saab JA37 (all variants) — in all-aspect pulse-doppler track mode (MPRF waveform) abeam targets can be tracked in look-up cases. In head-on aspect pulse-doppler track mode (HPRF waveform) abeam and tail-on targets tracking depends on signal return — to — ground clutter ratio. This means that abeam targets can be tracked in look-up cases and tail-on targets track range strongly depends on fighter altitude: higher — larger.
I’m not quite sure if the above comments on HPRF applies to other aircraft as well. Regardless, the HPRF FMICW waveform of the Foxhunter radar in TWS & PD-Angle-Lock (target tracking) modes should also be capable of tracking a notching (abeam) or stern-chase (tail-on) target in the absence of ground-clutter / chaff. There has previously been some discussion about whether Foxhunter has a permanent notch/stern-chase filter. Technical documentation refers to an automatically adjusting filter based on clutter return (so no permanent filter), but there IS a control for the notch filter in the cockpit. The limits of the control are seemingly still unknown (in a classified document), but I highly suspect it could be disabled entirely.
I have no idea how we’d start making a bug-report on that without diving into the subjects of radar frequency spectrums, sidelobes & transmit/receive leakage (all tiny on Foxhunter), doppler filters, Kalman Filters and frequency triplet identification. I just don’t have the time to write a short paper on the subject which would only be backed up by tenuous references for Foxhunter.
Link to last time I ranted about this, leading to a discussion with @Flame2512 , and with our supporting documents: Panavia Tornado (UK versions) - Technical data and discussion - Page 202 - Great Britain - War Thunder - Official Forum
@Gunjob Sorry to @ you, but do you have info regarding this?