Why 4? The manager wrote that it should be 1 degree))
Why do they contradict themselves?
Do they even play the game?
5 Likes
3.5, ue-1is faster, this will be like 2s25m
1 Like
There is only one thing Gaijin is consistent in: inconsistency.
Which Soviet tank is that? I’d like to know what info did they use to make it 37.6°/s
But I hope this speed won’t be nerfed because it will be unplayable
Maybe it’s worth creating a proposal and holding a vote on this forum so that BM Oplot gets 16 degrees per second of guidance??
Can someone create a topic?
10 Likes
I’ve got bad news, several Russian/German MBT’s have significantly overperforming vertical traverse rates.
The Leopard 2’s are currently on 40°/sec but should be 10°/sec.
The T-72B3, T-72B3A, T-90M and T-80BVM are currently on 40°/sec but should be 3.5°/sec.
This had been reported internally at Gaijin but nothing has really been done for years now.
1 Like
I mean the hull armor is still heavily WIP since part of the hull composite seems to be missing and none of the hull composite and ERA blocks have any protection values given to them.
Boy would those suck to play, and are any other tanks ludicrously over performing?
isn’t all the current MBT uses the travel traverse 40°/s for the horizontal instead of the aiming traverse?
pretty sure i was the Leo aiming was somewhere in the 30s.
What I don’t understand is why they don’t unify standards.
For some MBTs, they use the maximum stabilizer rates; for others, they use the "aiming speed"s…
So yeah. You get Leopards and T-80/90s with 40º/s speeds, then the Type 10s with 10 and now Oplot with 3…
8 Likes
Talk balance when historical, historical when balance🤓👆That’s their way
This video shows the vertical drive speeds to be greater than both 1/s and 3/s too.
I’m considering making a report once the 1/s one is closed, but if y’all want to do it, or have further evidence, feel free to use the video
7 Likes
Oh look who I just saw typing, the guy who made the 1/s report
Video evidence can’t be used sadly
I don’t think they’ll close my bug report about 1 degree per second. It would be hard to explain to the same manager who said 1 degree. Maybe in a few days when a new manager comes. I can close it myself if you want. His answer just meltdown me, and it was all post-irony anyway.
It would at least be a secondary source, pictures and videos have been used in the past, for example the T-90M’s spall liners
I mean, I’m not attacking you or the bug reporting manager, but there just isn’t enough information from KMDB to conclude that the MAX elevation speed is 1/s, and with videos showing otherwise, it would be unwise for gaijin to use any figure outside of the typical T series range.
I know that 16/s is likely false, as measured by the stabilizer, but there needs to be a middle ground somewhere between what KMDB says and what is shown
I closed it, but I don’t think you’ll get anywhere. The manager is just protecting the developers and will write all kinds of nonsense. But I’ll support you anyway.
Yeah, I understand that. Reporting managers have strict guidelines in what they can submit to the devs as evidence, so they can’t make many assumptions.
Anyone know if the oplot has a “NATO hump”?