So you think the recognition and friendliness of some countries are more valid than others. And you also say you are against bias and politicisation of a game. And you also lament the community for failing to adhere to a single standard when it comes to different countries.
Your hypocrisy and lack of self-awareness is staggering. I don’t think I’ll change your mind on this one, or anything else, but I hope people reading this conversation will have their own judgement.
2 Likes
Lmao.
You know what? United Korean TT is already declared by Gaijin and your logic is very cute.
3 Likes
Sorry to burst your bubble but I think dozens upon dozens of countries including big leaders not recognizing Taiwan supersedes what Vatican and Tuvalu have to say. I respect their opinions and I just simply state the vast majority of nations don’t align with them and their views.
I’m perfectly fine with Korean tree as a whole, but only if other similar things come to fruition which I already gave you an example of.
I don’t object VT-4 going to Japan or M1A2T to China, but if those happen then all of the other similar cases should as well, regardless of politics and biases.
You showcased your immense bias by being totally fine with Korean TT, while opposing the addition of UA under USSR, which are pretty much the same things at the very least. It’s because of people like you that I make these posts, but it flew over your head apparently.
You either bring politics into your decisions or you don’t, choose already.
1 Like
“SK guy taking claim of NK is absurd”? Then you the fuck are you? Not even a single argument you make make any sense.
2 Likes
What ?
How is MotorolaCRO a Japanese name ?
1 Like
I miss read between you and the OP. Changed it.
1 Like
Dystopian lifestyle is getting to you.
I’m a neutral 3rd party that can’t help but notice how it’s absurd seeing SK guy taking claim over NK.
1 Like
I made honest mistake and corrected mine, unlike you who is not interested in reality.
1 Like
I tell you what I’m seeing by looking at reality.
There’s no Korea as a whole, both SK and NK exist as valid countries that aren’t in good relations.
2 Likes
I never claimed Korea as a whole… Where tf did you get this idea from?? North and South, though is going through hard times, is willing to cooperate and find a solution. There are families from both sides unable to be united with their loved ones. There are active NGOs in the South that are willing to connect with North to find diplomatic relations. “arn’t in good relations”…
순위 (Listing)
2023년
- 중국 34% (China)
- 일본 24% (Japan)
- 북한17% (North K)
Statics from 2023 of most hated counties in S.Korea. Albeit, North was on the #3, but then why should be under Japan then? They are #2 on the list, and actually #1 for about a decade before.
2 Likes
No idea. Even before it was US as generally agreed option if a Korean tree isn’t possible. Japan was already sorted out very soon, and especially now where Japan already has subtrees it’s weird to see them brought back up.
Especially now that a Korean tree is even announced there’s really no reason to even worry about the place of a South Korean subtree, because there is no need when Korea can make a techtree.
3 Likes
Agree, I can’t tell if they are just brain dead or wants to go back to their imperialistic ways.
2 Likes
Where did I say I want Korea under Japan ?
I’m not Japanese.
1 Like
You’ve been arguing with many people above me to prove Korea should be under Japanese TT. So you are indeed brain dead. And yes I know you are not Japanese, but you sure are a weeb since you are willing to argue your way through the opinions of Koreans, and all the people who oppose this Jap hybrid TT for a reason.
3 Likes
I never once said Korea should be under Japan, you’re being straight up delusional right now.
Ease off on plastic surgery, will you ?
If I was a weeb I wouldn’t trash on recent anime slop additions, so you got it all wrong, again.
1 Like
Honestly giving each nation it’s own line like in WoT doesn’t sound that bad.
The thing I don’t like is that you can’t really fight those great historic, or even hypothetical, conflicts of the 20th century the way things are.
You can’t have east vs west Germany.
You can’t have China vs Taiwan.
You won’t be able to have N vs S Korea.
Also, with Norway in the Sweedish TT, Sweeden can be on redfor in Sim, so then you have Norway, a long time NATO country, fighting on redfor.
Due to the match maker, you usually have Iranian F-14’s flying with post-revolution Isreali jets that would never happen in real life.
It’s just a game, true. But I expect a certain level of immersion in a game that touts itself as being realistic.
Ultimately, the whole system needs a rework.
3 Likes
Posting this cause NK and SK seem to be planned as 1 tree, like it should. The Dev Q&A did confirm that’s the plan going forward.
1 Like
I can say exactly the same to Chinese TT and here we are.
1 Like
I strongly oppose the idea to implement any more tech trees. Implement more selectable flags and be done with it.
New standalone tech trees involve new crews and new expenses. Only for copy and paste.
1 Like
No because…
This is very incorrect. In the case of Koreas kinda true, but generally speaking this is very much false and proves you did no research
4 Likes