Opinion on how Sweden should receive new vehicles?

Game Discussion General Discussion
,
1

I have my own opinions on how and what gaijin should implement for Sweden (which may or may not be obvious from the fact that I’m making this in the first place), but I’d like to know other people’s opinions on this.
NOTE: If you have never played Sweden or have but don’t, this isn’t really for you; this is for the people who are would actually be affected by a change in how Sweden receives vehicles.
However, if you want any of these for other nations, vote for the one you prefer and reply with what nation you want it for; the more attention this gets, the more likely it is for the devs to see it.

Options I have come up with so far
  • Continue as-is - 1-2 vehicles per update, every update
  • Alternating - more/unique vehicles added per update, every other update (possibly fixing bugs in the off-updates)
  • Medium gaps - middle ground between above and below
  • Long gaps - multiple updates without any new vehicles, with a large number all at once (could be used to drop Swedish naval TT)
  • Other (explain in replies)
0 voters

The “Medium/Long gaps” option does NOT mean nothing for Sweden in these gaps; bug fixes that have been sitting accepted for years (cough cough Community Bug Reporting System cough cough) could still be fixed etc.
My hope is that updates can be exciting for all players, not just those who main the major 3 - or, if not exciting, at least building anticipation for future updates (and saving on copium; I know that at least the Swedish mains are running low lmao)
But, if being a Sweden main has taught me anything, it’s not to get your hopes up. It is extremely likely that nothing will come of this, since this is gaijin we’re talking about.

Detta är värgen / Dette er veien / Dette er vejen / Tämä on tapa

1 Like
2

One to two vehicles should be kept as a norm, every nation should recieve vehicles per update. If longer pauses between implementations is considered and being as a normal thing then we’ll return to the point zero of:

Either way you get one to two vehicles per update knowing they’ll not fulfill your expectations rather than thinking that longer periods between vehicles implementation means better vehicles the way you want, it actually won’t matter. Is a fact by this point that a lot of things handled in War Thunder don’t satisfy everyone, if longer gaps between vehicles implementation starts to be a thing there will be people complaining that X nation isn’t getting vehicles per update and so again we return to point zero.

As much as I don’t like every vehicle per update, I’d rather having at least one per nation being mediocre to good rather than expecting more than that in longer periods of time without something new. Just like most other nations Sweden is getting something new, even though it doesn’t satisfy everything, including me, I don’t think there are any gaps NOMADS can fill at battle rating 12.0.

3

None they deserve nothing

1 Like
4

That’s fair enough. I just feel that gaijin is giving just enough to show that they know Sweden still exists, but no real effort is being put in. It’s idyllic, I know, but if it were done correctly, it would be, imo, much better than what we have now.

I feel like if gaijin explained that they were doing that, there would be only marginally more people upset than when they announce literally anything.

5

Oh damn, you right, mb twin