Once again, gaijin proved their ignorance of the navy

Yes, the armored model looks great, but its appearance looks very strange, including huge command tower windows and a strange navigation bridge above, which is different from any Japanese warship in history and looks very strange. Perhaps this is related to Gaijin’s modeling outsourcing? Considering that this warship has never been actually built and lacks absolute certainty in details, external modelers may not be aware of some historical factors that have led to issues with their autonomy in details. I don’t know.

Yes, this doesn’t actually affect the game, but we all know that appreciating the beautiful warship/tank/airplane models in the game is also a part of the game, so of course gaijin should fix it to make it as realistic as possible, right?

good. Gajin has been putting far too much effort into a gamemode that almost no1 plays

this company is tone deaf, making bug repots is a waste of time.

2 Likes

It’s a long way down any list of priorities I would make.

But in any case the would need to be a picture of what they should be like.

Got one?

How can we obtain pictures of this ship if it hasn’t even been actually finished? It’s just that it can be determined through inference and drawings that what gaijin did was wrong. You can refer to this detailed report:Community Bug Reporting System

Given that there aren’t many people playing naval battles at all, I think Gaijin should reconsider and not hastily add new ships without sufficient confirmation that the production is correct. After all, there aren’t many people looking forward to it, especially when your ship model is very strange.

well given that they are adding hms repulse in “1941” refit but the weaponry is just straight wrong on it and it is closer to a 1938 refit you can hardly expect them to get a ship that never entered service to be correct and it is why i feel that they should never have gone into the land of the project and paper ships

1 Like