Well to their credit you did submit it on April Fools. It is a serious problem and discredits the true capabilities of the British. They’re portrayed as sitting in their tanks shooting things. They were shooting things and boiling tea.
With class.
Shame on you Gaijin
Why did we send those women up to space if we could have just pointed that thing upwards? They’d reach the nearest star in a matter of a few days.
We tried to return katy perry to her home planet but the 30 day return period was over
CAC Sabres would be a much better option
they’re the ones with the 30mm ADENs aren’t they?
Yes
That message is from over a year ago, so why are you responding to it?
And how are another nation’s Sabres better than the ones used by the RAF? And before you say “C&P,”. The Mk 4 was built specifically for the UK(and wouldn’t exist without them ordering it); the one in-game is an ex-RAF aircraft.
The RAF Sabres(oh, and ZA, as they used some CL-13s as well) should be TT 100%, the Aussie ones could be SQV or premium, along with a Canadian-operated Sabre as premium(but I’d prefure both Canadian and Aussie ones in new TTs for both Canada & ANZACs or a joint TT of both).
it’d be a good thing for the sabre, only really the F-2 has competitive punch in the gun department, and the ADENs are guns mainly limited by being on poor airframes most of the time,
especially with the much more powerful Avon engines that have the same max power as the CL13B
it would be quite the workhorse, Mk.32 would be a practically a direct upgrade over the CL-13B
CL-13B? Sorry, after spending months looking into Canadian aircraft, seeing a letter system used on a play that didn’t use it throws me for a loop.
The CL-13s only had Mk. (And I’m 90% sure all nations that used Canadair’s one called them Sabre MK ___ as CL-13 was just what the company who built them called to for production.)
The one in the German tree
CL-13B Mk.6
CL-13B for short
I see, I was mostly pointing out how that is wrong tho.
If that was correct, it would be CL-16 Mk 6 or Sabre Mk 6 more likely.
Only 1 variant of the Mk 6(and all Canadair Sabre marks that existed), as there can’t be an A/B/C/D, etc.
So shorting it to CL-13B is feeding Gaijin’s misinformation that is rampant with its names(far too many are incorrect) as a CL-13B doesn’t exist.
Why are you so argumentative?
Because incorrect info spreads misinformation, and misinformation does damage.
I know as my nation’s domestic tank is labelled as nothing more the a subvariant of a vehicle, it isn’t, do to an incorrect name that spreads misinformation.
As if you didn’t want an argument, maybe don’t say, a different nation’s Sabres are better for the UK, than UK operated Sabres, to the guy who wants the UK operated Sabres in the UK.
I just can’t understand why we can’t get the plane which we bought and operated (Sabre F.4 or P-400 Caribou/Airacobra) at all.
And there were centuries needed to bring RAM to our TT. :|
Also, I am really happy when bad US mains show a big red stop sign made by Iron, when we are trying to get anything that is built from ‘North America’ or has any kind of relationship with USA
because ‘Copy-paste is bad and we need to keep the uniqueness at all’.
While they enjoy their A6M2 or Spitfire LF Mk.IX in their TT at the same time. :/
All we have in rank 5 now are overtiered rubbish with a cool shape, which paid too much British taxes.
Either CL-13 or CAC Sabre will break through the current problem.
And CL-13 might be juicier because there are no jets with 50 cal in our TT, while CAC one is armed with ADEN, that trustworthy but used too much.