CL-13B? Sorry, after spending months looking into Canadian aircraft, seeing a letter system used on a play that didn’t use it throws me for a loop.
The CL-13s only had Mk. (And I’m 90% sure all nations that used Canadair’s one called them Sabre MK ___ as CL-13 was just what the company who built them called to for production.)
The one in the German tree
CL-13B Mk.6
CL-13B for short
I see, I was mostly pointing out how that is wrong tho.
If that was correct, it would be CL-16 Mk 6 or Sabre Mk 6 more likely.
Only 1 variant of the Mk 6(and all Canadair Sabre marks that existed), as there can’t be an A/B/C/D, etc.
So shorting it to CL-13B is feeding Gaijin’s misinformation that is rampant with its names(far too many are incorrect) as a CL-13B doesn’t exist.
Why are you so argumentative?
Because incorrect info spreads misinformation, and misinformation does damage.
I know as my nation’s domestic tank is labelled as nothing more the a subvariant of a vehicle, it isn’t, do to an incorrect name that spreads misinformation.
As if you didn’t want an argument, maybe don’t say, a different nation’s Sabres are better for the UK, than UK operated Sabres, to the guy who wants the UK operated Sabres in the UK.
I just can’t understand why we can’t get the plane which we bought and operated (Sabre F.4 or P-400 Caribou/Airacobra) at all.
And there were centuries needed to bring RAM to our TT. :|
Also, I am really happy when bad US mains show a big red stop sign made by Iron, when we are trying to get anything that is built from ‘North America’ or has any kind of relationship with USA
because ‘Copy-paste is bad and we need to keep the uniqueness at all’.
While they enjoy their A6M2 or Spitfire LF Mk.IX in their TT at the same time. :/
All we have in rank 5 now are overtiered rubbish with a cool shape, which paid too much British taxes.
Either CL-13 or CAC Sabre will break through the current problem.
And CL-13 might be juicier because there are no jets with 50 cal in our TT, while CAC one is armed with ADEN, that trustworthy but used too much.
Australia is a sub tree of the UK. Also the CAC sabres are more unique than a Cl-13.
False. Sadly.
We currently have no other sub-tree than India and South Africa.
Was it confirmed? I was under the belief that Aus/NZ vehicles placed in the UK tree were only there because that’s who they brought the equipment from, not because they were a sub-tree.
Which sadly allows for us to be split across multiple trees, the worst possible fate for any nation in WT.
Neither, Australia/ANZACs or Canada are sub-trees of the UK. So that isn’t a reason.
Also I said it before but the Sabre Mk 4/Sabre F 4(CL-13Mk 4) was built to British specifications, meaning it wouldn’t exist without the UK, so trying to argue “uniqueness” verses a vehicle that exists because of the UK, is not great.
Nope, the only confirmation we have is Gaijin will put their tech wherever they feel like, which is sad news.
Yas and no, older additions where tech rules still existed then yes, nowadays not so much if it fills a hole in the tree the that UK can’t and is picked over other Commonwealth nations then it’ll go to the UK, else it’ll go wherever.
I 100% agree, it’s a fate I wish on no one.
I believe my list of ideal treatment in WT was this
Independent TT
Nothing in game
Sub-tree
.
.
.
Being ripped across TTs.
Sub-trees would be higher if they got a rework to something like this: Subtree Rework - Nation Folders
As of right now they don’t exist to represent the sub nation but anything but that, with it primarily buff the host tree with the least amount of work.
I get their reasoning when they were new, and isntead we got the Hunter.
But these days, it just feels a little petty.
Their reasoning that “that area is full” is dumb.
At this point it’s any excuse to keep the British nerfed and underpowered.
Yeah…
Where did it come from, do u know?
As in where did it originate? Britain never got hands on T80U directly as far as I am aware.
Directly from Russia？
