As far as 90 % of USSR/RU prototypes are concerned …we only have Gaijin’s word that they existed ,since most of them were never seen or documented.
Since Object 279 i simply do not trust their sources
One of the reasons could be that it has little information, for example: kaktus era performance and composite armor
hasn’t stopped gaijin before
But the Obj 279 exists? In real life? And is drivable?
3 Likes
Understandable
they probably wouldn’t change T-80U’s 50/35/50/35/50 golden formula. And Cactus, well, they probably wouldn’t go away from Contact-5 much, Relict was developed much later sooo it would be somewhere in between, if not the same as K-5
1 Like
Oh, about kaktus… Isn’t it an early version of relikt or malakhit (armata era)?
cant be Monolit (not Malachite, as NII Stali refers to it as Monolit), Relict - possible, as it was developed around 6 years after Cactus
Thank you for correcting me, couldn’t remember the name
BOOOOOO UFO USSR BIAS 9000 TONK SEKRIT DOCUMENT BOOOOO
Aside from b#llsh!t the USSR tech tree needs the Object 640
9 Likes
Because of the new auto-loader can new longer shells be used with more PEN?
new autoloader? who promised it? same as on T-80U
🫡🫡
Russian super tank
Leak from gszabi:
2 Likes
“operation summer”… what’s that? An event like the T-80UD/be had?
I think yes. 10 stars event or what is it.
Odd, because they stopped doing summer operations in favour of the current event cycle.
there is no carousel, only bustle autoloader
They said they’ll have one or two events per year in the old style