The poster of the linked thread actually just copy and pasted the whole btvt’s Blog article and translated.
i think where okay on OP russian prototypes -1
There’s never enough comrade.
4 Likes
Unless more information comes out about it, it’s a no from me. This vehicles history and development seems to still be relatively classified or shrouded in secrecy, and I have doubts about its claimed capabilities.
1 Like
Understandable
1 Like
Is it possible to you find more information regarding the vehicle? I’m not trying to be mean and throw your time researching for those informations on the mud, but, I would suggest you going to https://btvt.narod.ru/, which despite being the same https://btvt.info/ still hold some information you may not covered in the topic but only linked it.
1 Like
There are some patents about autoloader.
+1 Man i want this badly, it’s the Object 292 but modernized on top having the possabilty having the 152mm makes it spike my russian bias detector
2 Likes
Just give me the '195 already.
3 Likes
Only as an event vehicle in my opinion.
1 Like
it’s a myth
but yeah, +1? hell no im giving it all my points I could. This is the most beautiful Russian tank, made by true Siberian professionals
4 Likes
Why is this not in game yet? It’s pretty iconic
1 Like
As far as 90 % of USSR/RU prototypes are concerned …we only have Gaijin’s word that they existed ,since most of them were never seen or documented.
Since Object 279 i simply do not trust their sources
One of the reasons could be that it has little information, for example: kaktus era performance and composite armor
hasn’t stopped gaijin before
But the Obj 279 exists? In real life? And is drivable?
3 Likes
Understandable
they probably wouldn’t change T-80U’s 50/35/50/35/50 golden formula. And Cactus, well, they probably wouldn’t go away from Contact-5 much, Relict was developed much later sooo it would be somewhere in between, if not the same as K-5
1 Like
Oh, about kaktus… Isn’t it an early version of relikt or malakhit (armata era)?