God, what tank takes 100 - 200 battles to get thermals. None.
Gaijin: takes 0 if you are rich, just spend money to unlock it bro
True, but even on normal grinding, 100+ games for thermals is something next to a troll or serious skill issue
I answered honestly. I firstly research usefull modules. Thermal is last))
Intresting opinion, I keep thermals quite usefull module. Especially when most opponents have em also. They give a huge advantage. Now when tanks have 1 fire extinquis on stock , even that is not so critical to research . I usually keep parts, ammo ,(fire) thermals. Depending on what tier modification is what. all those tracks, firecontrol etc are no so critical compared on firepower/survivability.
I just don’t understand in what situations thermal is applicable. It only helped once when ob292 smoked)))) I don’t really understand it.
🐱
If you’re like me and chronically blind in game, thermals are very useful. Acquiring targets and all that.
You can have an opinion on something you haven’t played yourself, but it gets weird when you call something you’ve played for a while to be brokenly OP while maintaining purely average performance in it compared to your other vehicles. This makes absolutely zero sense.
I have no problem with it going to 10.3 which I already said before, but I still do think moving it up to 11.0 or something like that some people are suggesting is hilarious.
Saying nothing more than “skill issue” as your opening post and providing zero arguments of why you think that’s the case with tank in question is far away from what I do.
You forgot about reload speed, which isn’t something to ignore. It reloads 2.9s slower than tanks equipped with 3BM42, which is one of the best rounds at that BR and can easily penetrate most things you see. Also, regardless of what round you have, you’ll still need to aim for crew/ammo if you want to OHK things and not just kill one crew member and getting killed as a result, so all of that extra penetration over 3BM42 doesn’t look to be as important.
I still think 3BM42 with 7.1s reload is a better overall combination than 152mm round with 10.0s reload.
1 Like
Like how I perform much better in the T-80BVM compared to any UK MBT and also the M1 AIM.
Pretty sure that wasn’t your original position, but don’t blame you for walking it back now.
No, instead you look at their playercard, and explain why they are a bad player and therefore their opinion is invalid, whilst simultaneously ignoring all the variables that influence playercards, potentially making them misleading.
They’ve finally broken me with the current state of the game though. It was bad enough letting Russia have an SPAA that is levels above everyone else, whilst simultaneously forcing UK/US to use an inferior platform categorised as a tank destroyer, so they can’t even use it at reduced SP. But then they decided to also give Russia the Kh38 (which I’m sure you’ll insist is completely balanced because it’s on a su25,) along with also teasing a positive rework of the chally2 on dev, only to revert all the improvements for the update? Along with the MANPADS devblog? I’ve finally given up and decided to not put another penny into the game. It’s just too blatant.
4 Likes
and dont forgot now we got T80UD at 10.0
is just russian bias with extra steps
1 Like
10.7 vehicle at 10.0 (where 2/3 of the whole soviet arsenal is located). 10.3 120mm guns can’t penetrate it’s turret almost at all, INCLUDING the mantlet/breach. Hull is immune as well, only 2 weakspots remain that are on top not a always a reliable 1htk.
Only M900 can deal with it (used by another under tiered vehicle), since the sprut m with svinets is conveniently on the same lineup and team…
This whole 10.0 soviet br is a joke
Obj 292: 10.0 → 10.7
2s38: 10.0 → 10.7-11.0
T80UD: 10.0 → 10.3
T72B: 10.0 → 9.7
6 Likes
BMP-2M noises intensifies
4 Likes
It’s not as insane. Maybe throw it at 10.3 as well
The Manlet is insane. Spall from penetrations don’t even reach the turret ammo. Even side shots to the hull barely spall. Try it out in the protection tool.
Yes, also, if you shoot through the driver’s window, any other Soviet tank will lose the breech of the gun, but ob292 often not.)))
We weren’t talking about BVM in the first place.
I have said that long before you joined this thread, no wonder you missed it. Most of my posts in the beginning of this thread was in a discussion with the OP where I stated obvious problems with 292 going to 11.0 or even 11.3 which was originally suggested.
Oh yeah, it never crossed my mind to call something to be brokenly OP while my performance in said vehicle is in line with my account average. So seeing someone else doing just that is really weird and I have to call them out on that one.
They’ve had M247 as the hands-down best SPAA at it’s tier for a long time, but I haven’t seen many people complaining about that one.
I feel you for ADATS though, US/GB should get something categorized as SPAA at top tier to use that reduced SP cost.
I didn’t have the time to play much of WT lately so this update went live without me even checking what’s new. That being said, I have no idea how bad/good that thing is, so discussing it would be pointless from my side.
I don’t know what they tried to improve but it’s a shame Challengers still haven’t been buffed alongside several other tanks from minor nations.
That’s actually a great move. If only more people took you as an example and started voting with their wallets I’m sure this game would be much, much better to play with way less annoying features and mechanics.
2 Likes
this tank is still a joke, it should be 10.7
it has good mobility
it has good armor
it kills everything with a HE round anywhere…
10.0/10.3 was a safe haven (2s38,bmp2m suck to play against but they are bearable) from russian bias but snail just cant have us enjoy a bracket, they must put absurdly OP russian vehicle there
2 Likes
What should the VIDAR be then? Also with the HE round you still have to aim.
definitely not 8.0 but this thread is about obj 292